Welcome!

edit

Hello, MohamedNashaath, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:23, 11 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your userpage

edit

Unfortunately it appears that you have restored the content I deleted from your userpage, which I have again deleted. Please ensure you read review this information and this page and do not add personal information such as your birth date, age or school anywhere on Wikipedia. --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:50, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

NashaathMohamed, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
The
Adventure
 

Hi NashaathMohamed!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Blocked from editing

edit

I have prevented your account from being able to edit as you have revealed too much personally identifiable information about yourself. If you would like to talk about it please email me. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 15:39, 13 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Hitler's Contribution to Germany

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Hitler's Contribution to Germany. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Adolf Hitler. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Adolf Hitler – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. bonadea contributions talk 11:51, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

A couple of notes

edit

Hi NashaathMohamed, this is just a friendly note to make you aware of a couple of important points: first, please don't create user pages for users other than yourself, and don't create user pages for user names that are not registered. Secondly, please don't create articles based on your own opinions. All Wikipedia articles have to be about subjects that are covered in reliable third-party sources and they must be neutral, both in terms of content and writing. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 12:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

June 2015

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Bonadea. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges.

I have no idea what you were trying to do, but please leave my user page alone. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 18:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:NashaathMohamed

edit
 

A tag has been placed on User:NashaathMohamed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thomas.W talk 18:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --NashaathMohamed (talk) 18:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Because nothing is against Wikipedia, this just contains the introduction of my user

June 2015

edit

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with User:NashaathMohamed. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:52, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --NashaathMohamed (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

why so... i promise I did'nt write anything against wikipedia or any of its users

Speedy deletion nomination of A speech on the value of Education

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on A speech on the value of Education requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 19:12, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

June 2015

edit

  This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at A speech on the value of Education, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is not an appropriate page, it's just a list of random quotes you made up. This, combined with the fact that your userpage is an autobiography despite having previously been blocked for this, suggests you aren't here to positively contribute to the encyclopedia. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:20, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of 10 things Shakespere' s writings teach us

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 10:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

June 2015

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  wL<speak·check> 12:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NashaathMohamed (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Since I started creating some or other administrators block. As I am new, either you guys could advise me. Instead you guys directly block me... I do not know why it is so. Still, I am just a student who is studying in a school. Please do not misunderstand me. And please forgive if I had used words that hurt you NashaathMohamed (talk) 20:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Please have only one unblock request open at any one tine. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NashaathMohamed (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I did'nt know my contribution is the worst in wikipedia. I just want to convey what I know to the whole world. God Promise/ Wallahi (Arabic). Once again I repeat : "please do not misunderstand meNashaathMohamed (talk) 20:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No-one has said that your contributions are the worst in wikipedia. But you do need to read, and understand, the links in the welcome message which you received and which are still available at the top of this page. When you have done this please feel free to make a convincing further unblock request here.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may possibly like to look at user adoption. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NashaathMohamed (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok, I agree to this idea. I am going to read... NashaathMohamed (talk) 04:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

And what did you learn from these links? What was wrong with your edits that got you blocked? Max Semenik (talk) 06:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NashaathMohamed (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ofcourse, I learned some new things. First and most important this is while creating pages, you should not reveal all of your personal information. 2nd one, You cannot make a webpage of a topic that is already chosen or created by other user. You cannot create a page of your opinion. NashaathMohamed (talk) 21:27, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This is a duplicate request, the most recent request is below. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:04, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NashaathMohamed (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sorry, big mistake because of my "hurry burry. Oh! I mean to say like your phone number, photo, school , address , your gender etc...........NashaathMohamed (talk) 13:35, 27 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am not convinced that you are truly aware of the reason that you are blocked, or what the purpose of Wikipedia is. Your only contributions thus far have been to create pages on a variety of subjects, including all of the good that Hitler did. I don't think that unblocking you would do anything more than waste people's time. A cursory look at this page, including all the declined unblock requests says as much to me. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:04, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.