User talk:Nansks/halbic languages

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Chuck Haberl in topic Final Review
WikiProject iconLanguages NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This page has been marked as needing an infobox.
WikiProject iconIndia: Chhattisgarh / Madhya Pradesh / Odisha NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by WikiProject Chhattisgarh.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by WikiProject Madhya Pradesh.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by WikiProject Odisha.
Note icon
This page has been marked as needing an infobox.
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this page.

Final Review

edit

Hi Nandini, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:

  1. Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar. 5 points.
  2. Structure: The structure is a bit idiosyncratic and does not appear to follow any template. 4 points.
  3. Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
  4. Accuracy: Most of the claims are backed by citations, but not all of the citations are of the same quality. 4 points.
  5. Relevance: Not all of information is relevant, particularly the Culture and Religion sections, which could probably be combined and shortened considerably. 3 points.
  6. Length: Word count 1918/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 4 points.

The final score is 25/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 23:38, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply