Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:31, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Nadia Younes at ASSABIL! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:31, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit
 

Hello Nadia Younes at ASSABIL. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nadia Younes at ASSABIL. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nadia Younes at ASSABIL|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 12:32, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: ASSABIL Association (September 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Lapablo (talk) 08:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Undisclosed paid editing (2nd notice)

edit
 

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Nadia Younes at ASSABIL, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nadia Younes at ASSABIL|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Nadia Younes at ASSABIL/sandbox

edit
 

Hello, Nadia Younes at ASSABIL. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Nadia Younes at ASSABIL,
I saw at WP:REFUND that you asked for a draft you worked on to be restored. This request was refused because of the reasons for its deletion. However, your sandbox was deleted as a CSD G13, which is a stale draft. It was only deleted because there had been no edits to it in six months. Pages deleted as CSD G13 can normally be restored upon request so I have restored User:Nadia Younes at ASSABIL/sandbox for you to work on. Please submit it to Articles for Creation for review and do not move it directly into the Wikipedia mainspace.
If you have questions, please visit the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Nadia Younes at ASSABIL/sandbox

edit
 

Hello, Nadia Younes at ASSABIL. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:06, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply