User talk:MrBoo/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions about User:MrBoo. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Fair use rationale for Image:InLovingMemoryOf.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:InLovingMemoryOf.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Fixed. --MrBoo (talk, contribs) 03:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:KimMitchell.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:KimMitchell.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Fixed. --MrBoo (talk, contribs) 03:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:PittsburghCrosseFire.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PittsburghCrosseFire.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Fixed. --MrBoo (talk, contribs) 10:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Vandals must have a final warning before being blocked on 130.156.48.2.
June 2007
Thank you for making a report about 130.156.48.2 (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. (Note that "recent" in this case means same-day at least!) Waggers 13:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- The vandal needs to have had a recent final warning. In this case in particular, the talk page header makes it clear that the IP is shared among several users. Therefore we can't assume that the current user has seen any of the previous warnings. They need to be warned today'. WP:AIV states clearly: "Editors: Before listing a vandal here make sure that the vandal is active now, has received a proper set of warnings, and has vandalized after a recent last warning, except in unusual circumstances." May 18th is not recent - certainly not recent enough to be sure that the user has seen the warning. Hope that helps. Waggers 14:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
References on Toronto Raptors
Because the original references are perfectly valid. FYI, it says so on the WP guidelines. More importantly, the article achieved FA status (17 or 18 votes of support) using those very citations which you changed. The citation format was even approved by some very experienced users. To be fair, using templates is perfectly legitimate. But unless you intend to continually update the article and therefore prefer to use templates, there is no real good reason to use templates. To be sure, quite a number of the NBA GAs and FAs use manual citation styles, such as Michael Jordan, Tim Duncan and Tony Parker. This style is not limited to NBA articles, see the soccer articles on Thierry Henry and Cesc Fabregas too. Basically, a good citation usually contains the article name, the article source, the article author, the article date, and if an online source, the accessed/retrieved date. An article of course should maintain a consistent and uniform style of citation. Chensiyuan 13:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:ThePleasureAndTheGreed.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ThePleasureAndTheGreed.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Fixed. --MrBoo (talk, contribs) 19:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
NLL Map
I removed Arizona and Boston. I'm presuming that the divisional setup will remain the same, but I can modify that later if the need arises. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danlaycock (talk • contribs) 22:47, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Knighthawks roster
I thought it was easier to add links to the names: (read the brackets doubly here) "[Sandy Chapman]" vs. "[Sandy Chapman|Chapman, Sandy]". It doesn't matter for most players right now, but I'm going to try to make entries for each player this season (with help from others in the Knighthawks Krew). I'm sorry if this throws off the standardization of the rosters.
While we're on the topic of rosters....is there anyway we can show a player is a transitional player (i.e., Steve Toll)? I noticed that the roster code will allow a player to be called a midfielder (MF), but that isn't quite what their position entails. Can we alter the code to allow a "TR"? --Paploo (talk) 15:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. --Paploo (talk) 16:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey...if you are in touch with other NLL fans on here, we should really get biographies on as many players as possible (especially those who have won championships) (not trying to gloat...I'm not sure if I would have been so enthusiastic this time last year). I'm going to work on Pat Cougevan first. --Paploo (talk) 16:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Travel Table
Do you mind if I use your travel table? It will make my page look a bit neater. --Paploo (talk) 16:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Request for comment on Category Redirect template
Because you are a member of WikiProject Categories, your input is invited on some proposed changes to the design of the {{Category redirect}} template. Please feel free to view the proposals and comment on the template talk page. --Russ (talk) 21:24, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Template:User WikiProject Lacrosse
A tag has been placed on Template:User WikiProject Lacrosse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Just want to say hello
I just wanted to say hello. I noticed that you created the wikiproject: lacrosse and are also a huge lacrosse fan. I also love lacrosse and have been working on a lot of articles on here. I was curious, should I create articles for players even if they are not "notable" stars? --Xander756 (talk) 01:22, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
NLL
So put the {{clear}} US - Jimmy Slade (talk) 16:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Category:National Lacrosse League templates
- As the creator, all you have to do is slap a {{db|reason}} template (giving a brief explanation) on the category page to get it Speedy Deleted. Cgingold (talk) 02:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
07 Shamrox Season
It has little text, and doesn't tell who the Shamrox are. I hope that helps. Basketball110Talk 21:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't notice the date of creation. Anyway...
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For working hard to clarify articles, I Basketball110Talk, hereby award you "The Editor's Barnstar." Basketball110Talk 23:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC) |
2008 Buffalo Bandits Season
Hey buddy, thanks for helping out with the 2008 Buffalo Bandits season article I made. Silversword55 (talk) 22:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Python!? That's pretty cool! I would like to try it out! Silversword55 (talk) 00:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Canadian Lacrosse Hall of Fame
Wanted to get your input on the Canadian Lacrosse Hall of Fame article. I have recently updated the List of National Lacrosse Hall of Fame members for the US hof using a sortable list. In my sandbox I have done something similar with the Can-lax-hof. I separated the teams from the individuals. Does this make sense? Is chronological better than alphabetical? Or vice versa? Any thoughts? (sidenote - do you think the cla will ever update its site?) Hope all is well. Mitico (talk) 16:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Great. I will move forward. Have a nice vacation! Mitico (talk) 16:44, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- When you have time, hoping to get you opinion at Talk:List of current NLL team rosters. Also, I am working on an draft for a WP:LAX navigation bar here, which you are welcome to alter or make suggestions to. At this point its just a copy of the one from WP:Cricket Mitico (talk) 18:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
reply
It's a violation of the WP:FAIR policy. Album covers are only fair-use in the article about the album the cover is sourced from. I specified that in my edit summary along with the link to the policy. It can't be used anywhwere else. The template rules also specify that only a free-use image can be used in the box. The Real Libs-speak politely 16:26, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:NewJerseyStorm.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:NewJerseyStorm.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:ColumbusLandsharks.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:ColumbusLandsharks.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:OntarioRaiders.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:OntarioRaiders.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:BaltimoreThunder.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:BaltimoreThunder.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:OttawaRebel.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:OttawaRebel.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:AlbAttack.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:AlbAttack.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:AnaheimStorm.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:AnaheimStorm.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:SyracuseSmash.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:SyracuseSmash.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:WashingtonPower.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:WashingtonPower.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Box lacrosse
Thanks! I really appreciate your comments and your assistance in the review process. As always, you're a big help. I'm working on splitting field lacrosse into a separate article with the same intention in mind. Mitico (talk) 12:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
NLL Map
Looks like Mitico took care of updating the NLL map before I got around to doing it. Danlaycock (talk) 21:14, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
A request for information from a neophyte to a wiser head
I have created a few pages for the San Jose Stealth roster. Days have passed and they still don't link from the roster page. Is there a special process for linking from the roster template? Mherr (talk) 20:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: Major North American professional sports teams changes
As the full text of the Major professional sports leagues of the United States and Canada article covers (quite well) the term "major sports league" is typically reserved for the team sports that have a large impact on the wider populace, not just the loyal fans. Alas, the NLL and MLL are largely unknown outside of the lacrosse community, which I do think is a shame, as lacrosse is a great sport, IMO. So, unfortunately, it seems that they're just not large enough to really qualify for the list. MLS is a borderline case, as well, but the building of stadiums for it kind of pushes it over the edge into major.
I'm interested to know what you think of the inclusion of the Mexican Premier Division teams. While it is quite true that they are the biggest thing going in Mexico, there is little linkage to the US and Canadian teams, which are tied together in the same leagues, for the most part.oknazevad (talk) 00:58, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
No content in Category:A-Class Lacrosse articles
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:A-Class Lacrosse articles, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:A-Class Lacrosse articles has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:A-Class Lacrosse articles, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:NewJerseyStorm.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:NewJerseyStorm.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yarnalgo talk to me 03:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: 2007 NLL season
I renamed it because that's the one I noticed. Since the main article is at National Lacrosse League, it made sense to use the same name for this article title. Powers T 17:44, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think the longer names are better; why would I change it back? Powers T 18:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry I didn't change them all immediately; I saw one and changed it to what I thought the title should be. I don't always have time to go through and change everything all at once. Powers T 19:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- So now you're saying I shouldn't do all the other pages. You told me before I should, if I was going to do one. What I've done so far is bring the MILL articles in line with the two Eagle Pro season articles. I don't think I have to do all the other sports as well. I'll get to the NLL articles in time. There's no deadline. Powers T 01:27, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see much reason why all the sports have to be consistent. Powers T 03:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have merged the various conversations and formally requested a move. Hopefully this will help. Mitico (talk) 19:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see much reason why all the sports have to be consistent. Powers T 03:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- So now you're saying I shouldn't do all the other pages. You told me before I should, if I was going to do one. What I've done so far is bring the MILL articles in line with the two Eagle Pro season articles. I don't think I have to do all the other sports as well. I'll get to the NLL articles in time. There's no deadline. Powers T 01:27, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry I didn't change them all immediately; I saw one and changed it to what I thought the title should be. I don't always have time to go through and change everything all at once. Powers T 19:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
{{NLL seasons}} using {{NavboxYears}}
So I was thinking of converting the NLL seasons navbox to use the semi-standard "years" version of the navbox. I've made up what it would look like side-by-side with what it looks like now at my sandbox. Tell me what you think because it is kind of a big change and I wanted your opinion. --Yarnalgo talk to me 08:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Honestly, I like the existing one better because the numbers aren't as spaced out. If the MILL/NLL had chosen the early part of the decades to change names rather than near the end (1989, 1998), it might work better. :-) --MrBoo (talk, contribs) 11:10, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Alright that's fine, thanks. --Yarnalgo talk to me 18:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC)