Mjb1981
Hi, regarding your edits to this article, please note that Shenyang is in mainland China; hence, Simplified Chinese rather than Traditional Chinese is the official script there. You are welcome to provide both versions when appropriate, but please don't put just Traditional Chinese without also putting Simplified Chinese. -- ran (talk) 16:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
World in Conflict honours system edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article World in Conflict honours system, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of World in Conflict honours system. -- pb30<talk> 18:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of World in Conflict honours system edit
I have nominated World in Conflict honours system, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World in Conflict honours system. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- pb30<talk> 22:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- I created a new page because the World in Conflict page itself has already been labelled as too long. I can see how this article can be interpreted as a game-guide, but that was not my intention. I wanted to add the details of the medals in the game as it is an important part of multiplayer mode. Perhaps it should be turned into a list.
You appear to have added an edit that suggests HMS Conqueror released life rafts to aid Belgrano survivors. Do you have a source for that please, I originally added a {fact} tag but another editor has now removed that statement. Justin talk 08:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- I think it was on a televised documentary which referred to some HM government transcripts or a press release. I'm afraid I cannot remember exactly, but I would not have added that fact if I was in doubt at the time.
Fleet Air Arm Museum edit
Thanks for your edits to Fleet Air Arm Museum. I've removed the stub tag as it is definitely start class now. To make it even better we need to be referencing the information to the guide book/web site & other sources where possible.— Rod talk 14:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
I've replied at the HMS Kentish talkpage, but I'll pop it here as well -
- Technically no, the prefix HMS only develops at the end of eighteenth century (about the 1780s or thereabouts) so no ship before this would be known as HMS... Even when it comes into use there were many variations, hence HMAV (His Majesty's Armed Vessel), HMB (His Majesty's Brig). Submarines during the early twentieth century could be referred to by the prefix HMSm. Similarly you could get HM troopship, or HM armed trawler. The editorial practice here is to backdate the prefix, so to treat the ship as how it would be prefixed as if it was entering service today. I'll add a qualifier to that though, as sometimes 'HMS' gets added to ships that weren't actually officially commissioned (there are huge numbers of small craft during the Second World War that were RN crewed and so on, but which were never actually formally commissioned, and so are not entitled to the HMS prefix - but other sources simply label them as such anyway). Something to keep an eye out for though.
- As to the Royal Navy website, to be honest I'd be a bit wary of that. Sometimes their specific meaning isn't clear, such as when they used what is probably a commissioning date for one of the HMS Kents which I think confused you into thinking it was a launch date. Normally as long as you can check with other sources though, you can work out what's going on. Prison ships were indeed common, but that Kent isn't listed as one in Colledge, which is where I'd expect to find it, or Warlow, or Lavery (though those are somewhat longer shots) is a bit odd. So I'm just a little suspicious, but there are often gaps and discrepancies for information of ships of this era. I wouldn't be opposed to re-adding it to the article now I see where you got it from, but it made me wonder when I couldn't find it referenced elsewhere.
Happy to help with the other articles, especially HMS Westminster. I tend to buff up new articles with little tweaks and knick-knacks. Just putting the finishing touches to a pretty sound article overall, so nothing more than a few cosmetic tweaks and formats were needed. Keep up the good work! Give me a bell if you have any more questions. Benea (talk) 01:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
I've added the following points on Ben's talk-page:
Fairly obviously, NONE of the Commonwealth warships bore the prefix HMS at any time, since they had just (1649) executed His Majesty and abolished the monarchy, it would have been ridiculous to use the "His Majesty's Ship" description. In fact, the description "His Majesty's Ship" was not in use until after the Restoration in 1660, and the acronym "HMS" is much more modern - a 19th century introduction. The name Kentish was changed to Kent at the same time (i.e in June 1660), as were the names of many of the Commonwealth era warships which had been built with names that were unwelcome to the new monarchist regime. Remember also that "His Majesty's Ship" only referred to proper ships (i.e. vessels with a three-masted ship rig) and not to brigs, ketches, schooners or any other type of rig. We have a problem in our formatting in that Wikipedia habitually (but wrongly) uses "HMS" for all early British warships, and of course they didn't use that descriptor. Rif Winfield (talk) 18:07, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Welcome edit
No one had welcomed you, so I figured that I would. Have a great day!
|
Burma edit
Okay, I have created Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Burma. I have added you along with added 18 other users (including myself) to the list of involved parties. The ones I have listed are ones who have commented recently, or who commented on the Mediation Cabal case (except if they solely made a neutral comment). If you disagree with me listing you there, remove yourself from it if you wish. If you feel someone else should be involved, add/ask them. I hope those I have added are alright though. I also hope this step is what finally ends this dispute! Deamon138 (talk) 00:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Request for mediation not accepted edit
|
A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Burma. |
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
- I've started a new page for structured mediation if you're interested. BigBlueFish (talk) 13:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Ski-jump ramp edit
Xilinhot image edit
Hi, if you have windows vista on your computer, you can easily create such images yourself, with a proper vector graphics program (like Inkscape, I think).
However, there is a problem with your image: the "hot" part, i.e. the word on the right hand side, is wrong. The "o" in hot is a so-called "back" o, the kind of o that comes with u ("back" u) or a. this is usually transcribed as "o" in the most common western transcription (the PRC has developed a different transcription system, in case you wonder), and as "ө" in cyrillic Mongolian. What you wrote (probably copied from the article on Hohhot, Kökeqota in the common western transcription, Хөх хот in Mongolian) is a "front" o, the kind that comes with e, or ü ("front" u). This letter is usually transcribed as ö in the western transcription, or as ө in cyrillic Mongolian. As the "kh"-consonants are also divided into two classes, one that comes with back vowels, and one that comes with front vowels, the first letter of "hot" is also incorrect. It needs to look like the first two letters of "Hovd", i.e. like 
up to the "b". Cf. the image in the upper right corner of the city's official webpage.
Hopes this helps a bit. I am also far from literate in the traditional script. Usually I try to look up a writing on official websites and the like before I create it for Wikipedia. You can also try asking around at the Mongolia work group, there should be some people who can tell you whether what you wrote is orthographically correct or not. Regards, Yaan (talk) 11:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Also cf. my first attempt at writing Hohhot in Mongol bichig (quite correct, except that the name is now written as one word):
. Yaan (talk) 12:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- I have now uploaded a new, correct, version, and nominated the old one for deletion. I also noticed that there was a problem with Image:Eriyen qota.svg, so maybe that is where your confusion came from? Regards, Yaan (talk) 14:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:Silinhot Mongolian Script.png listed for deletion edit
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Silinhot Mongolian Script.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Yaan (talk) 14:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello,
Just a quick note : I had revert your recent edit to above pages, as the Jersey, Guernsey and IOM pound are not currencies, but rather only local versions of the pound sterling. To quote the Jersey pound page : "Jersey is in currency union with the United Kingdom, and the Jersey pound is not a separate currency but is an issue of banknotes and coins by the States of Jersey denominated in pound sterling, in a similar way to the banknotes issued in Scotland and Northern Ireland (see Banknotes of the pound sterling)." 20:40, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey edit
Are you the one who changed the List of wars 1900-1944 and 1800-1899 pages? If you are, great job. Please do the same to the other list of wars pages. And don't forget to add the 1979 Iranian Revolution. 199.219.187.29 (talk) 15:41, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Abass Ibrahim edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Abass Ibrahim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Epeefleche (talk) 01:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- I've responded in the article's talk section. Note that the speedy-deletion tag was added before I added sources to the article, I didn't delete it once sources were added (assuming that an administrator should be the only one to delete such a tag). I've added another source to-day in case the others were deemed unreliable in some way.
- I've stated my reasons for adding the article and I won't make any further comment; the decision is yours.
- Mjb1981 (talk) 12:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Location maps edit
It has been requested by droll [chat] that {{Location map start}} should no longer be used, because it currently receives little support, and that maps should be created using {{Location map+}} instead. He has converted the other maps on the List of castles in England page to this template, and also implemented support for links to geohack, which I have added to the Berkshire map.
Thanks for your innovation on the List of castles in England page. I hope you are up for finishing the job! It does however remain to be seen whether a county such as Northumberland will work neatly on the page, and whether a full set of maps can be accommodated without the page becoming too large and slow to load. - Paravane (talk) 19:56, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Apologies, I didn't see that request. I did see the concern about Northumbria and that is the county I'll do next to see how busy it looks.
- Mjb1981 (talk) 20:11, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- It looks as if you have been doing great things with location maps of castles on List of castles in England. This has been suggested as a potential lead image for a new list article List of castles in Somerset and I was wondering how difficult they are to create, or whether you could help out?— Rod talk 09:11, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Castle Barnstar... edit
|
Castle Barnstar | |
| For excellence in producing all those maps of English castles. Hchc2009 (talk) 11:29, 27 August 2011 (UTC) |
Consensus at List of castles in England edit
 | A consensus is taking place at Talk:List of castles in England#Consensus to split List of castle in England. You are invited to participate. Ma®©usBritish [talk] 21:29, 19 September 2011 (UTC) |
Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll edit
This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:14, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll edit
This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:03, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Moving Burma to Myanmar - new 2015 poll edit
You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Mjb1981. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (Germany's Most Beautiful Railways) has been reviewed! edit
Thanks for creating Germany's Most Beautiful Railways, Mjb1981!
Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Notability is sort of established through weight of existence, but the article needs wider sourcing.I've commented out and tagged the commercial links (see WP:ELNO#5)
To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 10:44, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, Mjb1981. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:25, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Mjb1981. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Location map Lancaster edit
Template:Location map Lancaster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:12, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article Abass Ibrahim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of notability. Two sentences in the whole article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Nomination of Abass Ibrahim for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abass Ibrahim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Thepharoah17 (talk) 06:39, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Orphaned non-free image File:Xerath Band Logo.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Xerath Band Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Abass Ibrahim edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Abass Ibrahim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PARVAGE talk! 21:54, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Abass Ibrahim for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abass Ibrahim (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.