Mike barrie
|
re Diane Massam
editOur notability criteria for academics is at WP:PROF, and Massam appears not to meet them. Specializing in an obscure field is not proof of notability (quite the opposite in fact, generally) nor is being a top person in a field if the field is small. If she does meet our notability standards, you are welcome to recreate the article with verifiable citations and material showing why Massam is a truly notable person. Don't be discouraged; we all have had articles deleted, especially when first starting out. It takes a while to get used to all this. Hope to see you around, cheers, Herostratus 03:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Deletion of Professor Diane Massam
editA page on Diane Massam was deleted and I would like to suggest to have it re-instated. I have read through the lengthy discussion regarding notability and academics and feel that this person does meet notability requirements. Regarding the requirements on the following page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28academics%29
Massam answers affirmatively to the first two criteria as she is often invited internationally to give guest talks in her field (Austronesian Syntax). She has also been invited as a guest professor at Harvard to teach in her field of expertise. Regarding the third criterion, her work on pseudo noun incorporation (admittedly rather obscure) is virtually a required citation for anyone who works in this area or any closely related area. The fourth criterion is represented weakly by Massam; however, she her work is frequently the discussion of other scholars in her field. Her proposal for pseudo noun incorporation was a novel approach to a difficult problem and has since served as a spring board for other researchers in related fields, which, I believe, meets the 5th criterion. Regarding the 6th criterion, Massam has been awarded Full Professorship at her home institution, a honour which is conferred upon a small number of tenured faculty.
Let me briefly mention why I authored this article in the first place. I came across the following site:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_linguists
I noticed that many people listed here did not have pages, so I thought it was up to someone who has access to the relevant resources to make pages for people on this list for whom they felt they were qualified to do so. If this was an unwise assumption for me to make, then I apologize.User:Mike Barrie 21:14, November 19, 2006 (UTC).
- I've restored the article and moved it to User:Mike barrie/Diane Massam. You should add some of the information you gave above and anything else you can to show that she meets WP:N.
- BTW, your signature shows User:Mike Barrie but your actual username is User:Mike barrie (with a lower-case b). You should probably fix that so people don't start sending messages to User talk:Mike Barrie. —Wknight94 (talk) 21:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Elizabeth Cowper, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Eastmain 17:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Is it possible to find some more sources of information on this topic Elizabeth Cowper? It is tagged with a notability tag, and there are currently 31 articles in the scope of wikiproject Canada which are tagged with notability concerns, so I am contacting all the article creation editors to see if the quantity of notable articles can be reduced, and quality increased. For more help see this note. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 18:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Canadian Linguistics Association, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~cla-acl/, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Canadian Linguistics Association and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Canadian Linguistics Association with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Canadian Linguistics Association. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Canadian Linguistics Association with a link to the details.
It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Canadian Linguistics Association/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Canadian Linguistics Association saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Whpq 14:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Lampingtons disease, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Natural number is e 02:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Gay chicken
editI have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Gay chicken, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. AJR | Talk 00:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)