Metrodyne
Welcome to Wikipedia!!! edit
|
Idaho Falls edit
Good job on finding those references for bits of the Idaho Falls, Idaho article. One question: one of your citations is to the Deserte News. Do you mean the Deseret News? Nyttend 05:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
"See also" sections edit
Hi, I see you have put back the links I removed from the "See also" sections in Henry's Fork Caldera and other articles. According to our manual of style (WP:ALSO#"See also" section), 'Links already included in the body of the text are generally not repeated in "See also" ...'. All of the links I removed were already included in the body of these articles. Can you please explain why you think they should also be listed in the "See also" section?
By the way, thanks for splitting Henry's Fork Caldera out of the Island Park Caldera article. It works a lot better that way. -- Avenue (talk) 00:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Response> I was not aware of the style manual. I did not know they were removed. I was edititing several articles at once and had no idea any were purposely deleted. I thought I had just missed them. Go ahead and delete or I guess I should.
As to Island Park Caldera vs Henry's Fork Caldera...there is a lot of confusion on this. Some people call the Island Park Caldera the "Hucklyberry Ridge Caldera" or the "First Cycle Yellowstone Caldera". Lisa Morgan, who with Bob Christiansen (sp?) are the two leading experts on SRP-Yellowstone volcanism and I beleive they use "Island Park Caldera" becasue the geologist who discovered it had it wrong and did not know there were actually two, besides the Yellowstone Caldera. They kept the name of Island Park because it was his name but created a new name for the more recent caldera that he was unaware of. I am not a geologist but was corresponding with Lisa Morgan a few months ago.
I noticed that you contributed to the Bear River massacre article, by quoting a newspaper article into the main article about the massacre.
First, I want to let you know that I appreciate your interest in this event, and I really would like you to contribute to the article if you think there is some additional information that could be added. Please, if you want to help improve the article, it is encouraged and I hope that you continue to make many more high quality edits in the future.
I left a longer note on Talk:Bear River massacre#Moving letter to Wikisource explaining my actions in regards to this letter that you added. I felt, given the nature and the fact that it is the entire letter to the editor, that it deserved to be placed into Wikisource instead of Wikipedia. Typically, verbatim duplication of an original source is not appropriate for an encyclopedia entry, and Wikisource does a better job of safeguarding original source material documents like this anyway. It is linked to other content about the Bear River Massacre, and it does provide an important historical context about what happened at the time. Thank you for taking the time to find this note!
If there is some way to add a short thumbnail of the events in this letter back into the main article, or better yet finding some additional source material about this event, it would be significantly appreciated. The purpose of this section of the article, at least how I originally organized it, was to show a broad pattern of hostile interactions between the native peoples what is today eastern Idaho and the American settlers traveling through the region in the middle of the 19th Century. I'll even try to help you out if you are stuck at figuring out where to go from here. --Robert Horning (talk) 16:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Response edit
Metrodyne>Why did you move the Deseret story about the torture of the girl out of the article? It is probably one of the most important factors that contributed to the massacre especially where it was reported in the newspaper. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.49.186.130 (talk) 19:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Metrodyne Response to your posting to my talk page> Geese...it was not a letter to the editor. It was an article written in the Deseret News that quotes a letter that was written by a military official (I do not have the Deseret News articel to verify this now) I believe. It is an iron clad source where the incident was investigated by the US Calvary. Noted historian Brigham Madsen writes of it in several of his publications. Anyone can deny anything but if nothing else, the story is important simpley because it appeared in the Deseret News that many people in the area read. How can a source be better than that.
I will add Madsen as a source and see if he cited military documents but how far do we have to go to please you. It seems to me you have a preconcieved notion that Indians were always inocent.
I also think it is wrong to simply remove the entire section and then chalenge me to fix it. If you don't like it, maybe you should fix it. But it has an iron clad source, it is maybe one of the most important facts to the topic, and it should be in the Bear River massecre article! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Metrodyne (talk • contribs) 20:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- I am trying to "fix" the article. If you think more of a mention needs to be put into the main Bear River Massacre article, OK. I'll even go so far as to write a synthesis of what was said.
- The last thing I want to do is to engage in an full-out edit war over this particular piece of information. Please, understand that what we are trying to do is write an encyclopedia article about the topic and not necessarily publish complete verbatim original source material.
- BTW, as much as I like the Deseret News as a source, this by itself is not justification or rationale to consider what is written as a historic fact. Almost every other incident that I've been involved with writing about in the main Bear River Massacre article has been noted from multiple sources of information, first hand accounts, and even competing and independent news coverage from contemporary reports.
- For more information, please see Wikipedia:Verifiability that goes into some of the basics here about this concept and Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources has some additional basics to consider when trying to use primary sources of information like you are doing.
- Again, I did not "destroy" the material that you added, but instead moved it to s:The Late Massacre near Fort Hall. This is the most appropriate place to put information of this nature, as what you've added here is an original primary source of information. Please read s:Wikisource:What is Wikisource? to at least understand what Wikisource is all about. As for the manner in which you've added this content to the Bear River Massacre article, I am challenging that. I'm not trying to destroy what you've added, but you need to make a citation and not a complete verbatim quote of the whole of the source material. I am certain that if you took the trouble to search out more information about this incident, that you could find additional primary and secondary information about it that would not only give credibility but also fill in information about this particular incident.
- As far as "fixing" the article... OK, I'll do just that. Please, don't fight me on this issue, but help me to write a better article. --Robert Horning (talk) 23:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- It was a short newspaper story that in and of itself, true of false, is part of the history.
Image copyright problem with File:1918circa-Tud Kent Way to Race-Wiki.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:1918circa-Tud Kent Way to Race-Wiki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:1925circa-Dog Derby Ski Jump-Wiki.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:1925circa-Dog Derby Ski Jump-Wiki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:1917-Kent Monday-Wiki.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:1917-Kent Monday-Wiki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 06:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:1925circa-Dog Derby Ski Jump-Wiki.jpg edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1925circa-Dog Derby Ski Jump-Wiki.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:20, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
File:MoistureChannel.jpg edit
Hi Metrodyne,
your map of the Snake River Plain moisture channel was posted on FixWikiMaps as a candidate for an update. I wanted to give it a shot, and now I have a question: How did you determine where the moisture channel joins the Pacific? Did you have a reference map for this? When I looked into this, I found one paper that identifies the primary moisture pathway that delivers moisture to the Snake River Plain to start in San Francisco (Alexander et al., "Moisture Pathways into the US Intermountain West Associated" with Heavy Winter Precipitation Events", 2014).
Thanks for your help! --Tentotwo (talk) 18:51, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:1923-Gaston Dog Derby Crowd-Wiki.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:1923-Gaston Dog Derby Crowd-Wiki.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 07:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
File source problem with File:1906AshtonHotel.jpg edit
Thank you for uploading File:1906AshtonHotel.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
File:1910AshtonWest.jpg listed for discussion edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1910AshtonWest.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Metrodyne. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)