Melissadu

Kim Neilson

You created a page named Kim Neilson right? We need to know if it's a hoax. If it is/isn't tell us here - Kalajan€·₣ 15:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Rebecca Curci Hickenbttom

A tag has been placed on Rebecca Curci Hickenbttom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TerriersFan (talk) 21:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Catalina White

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Catalina White, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Not a notable wrestler yet. Hasn't won a championship or been with the company for very long. Developmental wrestlers are often released and never heard of again, so working in FCW does not establish notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nikki♥311 21:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Maggie Smith Addition in Cast of Deathly Hallows

I noticed that you have proceeded to add Maggie Smith to the Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (films)|Deathly Hallows]] cast. I removed her once and you added her again. Just a friendly reminder, you need a confirmation from an interview or something similar to be allowed to add her. Even though Maggie Smith is likely to reprise her role in these films, we can't add her to the list until we have proper confirmation that you should reference by her name. Joe299 13:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Florida Championship Wrestling, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 02:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Karlee Perez

The article Karlee Perez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't satisfy WP:ATHLETE, as she only has competed in WWE's farm team, FCW. Doesn't have any third party sources to help establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki♥311 18:35, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Karlee Perez

I have nominated Karlee Perez, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karlee Perez. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nikki♥311 20:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angela Fong

A tag has been placed on Angela Fong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dcheagle (talk) 20:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Beverly Mullins

A tag has been placed on Beverly Mullins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dcheagle (talk) 20:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karlee Perez

A tag has been placed on Karlee Perez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dcheagle (talk) 23:28, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Beverly Mullins

A tag has been placed on Beverly Mullins, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Onorem♠Dil 00:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 01:32, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Please stop recreating articles recently deleted at AFD. This behavior is considered disruptive and can get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nikki♥311 20:33, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you continue to recreate articles deleted at AfD you will be blocked from editing because of disruptive behavior. Thanks. Nikki♥311 04:10, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Trinity McCray

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Trinity McCray, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikibin.org/articles/trinity-mccray.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Trinity McCray

A tag has been placed on Trinity McCray requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Steam Iron 02:30, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karlee Perez

A tag has been placed on Karlee Perez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Steam Iron 05:06, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karlee Perez

A tag has been placed on Karlee Perez, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Steam Iron 05:06, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

A note

Please do not recreate pages which were deleted as a result of community discussion, such as Karlee Perez. Such behavior constitutes disruptive editing and may result in blocking your account. Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Angela Fong

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Angela Fong, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://angela-fong.com/index.php/angela/biography. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:11, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angela Fong

A tag has been placed on Angela Fong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 01:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

24 hour block

Your account has been blocked for 24 hours for the recreation of Beverly Mullin, which had been previously deleted by AfD. You have been warned multiple times that recreation of deleted articles would result in a block of you account. After the block is over, you may continue to edit constructively. If you want to recreate an article, you may bring it up at Wikipedia:Deletion review. However, if you continue to ignore warnings from other users, it will result in longer blocks and possibly an indefinite block. Nikki♥311 17:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sarona Snuka

The article Sarona Snuka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE as she hasn't worked at the top level of her sport (FCW is a farm team). Doesn't meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki♥311 21:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Sarona Snuka

I have nominated Sarona Snuka, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarona Snuka. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nikki♥311 21:30, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not shout

Melissadu - despite your passion about the article Sarona Snuka, it does little good for the article or your contributions to the community when you WP:SHOUT in the deletion debate. You will achieve great success as a WP editor when you defend articles on their merits and strive to improve WP IAW its guidelines and policies. WP:SHOUTING as you did in the Sarona Snuka debate does not contribute to community consensus. --Mike Cline (talk) 03:39, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Recreation of Sarona Suka

Please do not recreate the Sarona Suka article. It has been deleted via this AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarona Snuka. If you feel this deletion was in error, you must take your concerns to WP:DRV. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:51, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Jamie Keyes

Hello! Jamie Keyes was listes on Other on air employees. So I removed your change cause it was double. No Problem! --Hixteilchen (talk) 19:09, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Sarona.png

Thank you for uploading File:Sarona.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:30, 25 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:30, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Naomiknightvsajlee.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Naomiknightvsajlee.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 15:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Fcwdivajamiekeyes.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Fcwdivajamiekeyes.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:26, 25 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 17:26, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Saronass.png

Thanks for uploading File:Saronass.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nikki♥311 00:30, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Karlee Perez

The article Karlee Perez has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ηyχαμς 19:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Recreating the Sarona Snuka article

This is the second time you have created the Sarona Snuka article, which was deleted through an AfD process. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked or banned. If you believe the article should be re-recreated, please take it to WP:DRV. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:35, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked for editing for a time of 48 hours due to your continuing disruptive editing. After several warnings, you have recreated the Sarona Snuka article at Sarona Reiher. You have been told several times that the correct process in recreating an article that has been previously deleted is by deletion review. Continuing to act in this manner will result in longer and longer blocks. Thanks. Nikki♥311 23:48, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brittany Beede

The article Brittany Beede has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 08:07, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Trinity McCray

The article Trinity McCray has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 08:10, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you re-create a page deleted by AfD, such as Sarona Snuka/Sarona Reiher, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:12, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 48 hours, for repeatedly recreating the Sarona Snuka/Sarona Reiher article, deleted at WP:AfD. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jayjg ^(talk) 16:20, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Well, Jayjg, i dont see what i am doing wrong, Sarona Snuka is at the top of her sport, she is the on the main roster and the top of that promotion, what else can she do to get a wiki page, everyone else has one so i dont understand why you keep deleting, i find it very disrecpectful and if there is a problem with her page, or needs to be fixed in some way, you could help and fix the problem instead of deleting it.

As I explained several times, if you think the article should be restored, you need to make that argument at WP:DRV, and they will decide. You can't just keep recreating it, and hoping no-one will notice. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:02, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Creating a sockpuppet to recreate the article wasn't very smart. You've been warned about recreating deleted articles many, many times. The next time the block will be for a month. If you want an article recreated, you need to use the proper process. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:43, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Excuse Me, Jayjg, i am getting sick and tired of you pickin on me, on this website, so now i get banned for new good reason, i never even recreated that Sarona Snuka page, since like June 6, and i never created a socket puppet or what ever you called it, and plus what i would like to know, is what kind of problems do you have with Sarona Snuka that you wont let people create her a wiki page, people in the indy wrestling world even have pages but a WWE Superstar/Diva who is on the main roster of the Worlds Biggest Wrestling Company cant have a wiki page because you keep deleting it. And if there are problems with the page, then why dont you help make it better instead of always deleting it.

You've been blocked 4 times now for recreating deleted articles, and been warned twice as many times. The next time you do this you will be blocked for a month. Please re-think your way of dealing with this issue; you've been given very clear guidance on what you must do if you think the article should be re-created. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:10, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of World Wrestling Entertainment employees, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Steam Iron 00:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for You recreated the deleted article twice this time, and did it with another sockpuppet. Next time the block will be indefinite.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:39, 16 September 2010 (UTC)