December 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Wesoree. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gandabahali without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wesoree (Talk) 14:29, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Draft:Ramgarh Hill, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hi Meherpila! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 11:53, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move rejected draft articles to mainspace, as you did at Draft:Ramgarh Hill, you may be blocked from editing. This article submission was rejected. It needs further work. Belbury (talk) 21:14, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Draft:Ramgarh Hill. Belbury (talk) 09:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Gandabahali. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. The image_map infobox field is for images of maps, not for skyline photos. Belbury (talk) 15:06, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ramgarh Hill moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Ramgarh Hill, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, currently you have zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:50, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ramgarh Hill moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Ramgarh Hill, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:16, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramgarh Hill (December 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Meherpila! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ramgarh Hill moved to draftspace again

edit

Your draft submission was declined with some feedback. That means you should consider the feedback, amend the draft and resubmit it, not that you should move the draft into mainspace unchanged. Belbury (talk) 12:46, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Use of multiple accounts

edit

  Hello, Meherpila, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Iptesh Kumar Meher (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 12:53, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022

edit