Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanley Brauner (December 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 06:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mattbrauner! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Mattbrauner. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Stanley Brauner, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 08:00, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Buzz Brauner was my grandfather. He was notable enough to be mentioned in several books and many newspaper articles throughout his life, which I am in an ongoing process of adding as references. He's also already mentioned in 8 other Wikipedia pages where he is credited for his achievements. I'm trying to finish the job by giving him his own page like many of his former colleagues. Please let me know if you have any suggestions for how to get my submission accepted. Mattbrauner (talk) 08:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanley Brauner has been accepted

edit
 
Stanley Brauner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:05, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable non-free use File:Glenn dicterow violin.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Glenn dicterow violin.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

The image already has a WP:NFCC#1 tag on it with an explanation. There is no free equivalent image on the internet - feel free to do your own research and see for yourself. If that's not sufficient, feel free to remove the image. Mattbrauner (talk) 02:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply