LoneWrita

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaptain Kush (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaptain Kush and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kaptain Kush, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 13:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

LoneWrita, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi LoneWrita! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaptain Kush (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaptain Kush and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kaptain Kush, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Kindly check it now if it's qualified for a space in the wikipedia page LoneWrita (talk) 18:35, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Kaptain Kush moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kaptain Kush, does not demonstrate notability or have enough reliable sources or citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline together with WP:NACTOR and WP:NMUSIC and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thank you for your submission. Eagleash (talk) 06:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Would work on that now, I will gather enough verifiable source for itLoneWrita (talk) 07:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello LoneWrita. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:LoneWrita. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=LoneWrita|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 08:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

I understand that my edit might have warrant any suspicion but I am not and wasn't compensated in anyway to make edit on Wikipedia. I'm currently gathering enough source for the article I made so that it can be accepted on wikipedia.LoneWrita (talk) 10:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LoneWrita (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

A page I recently created Kaptain Kush was suspected to have violated the (G5: Created by a banned or blocked user in violation of ban or block which was linked to (Anniebisilolo), While the deletion was still being contested, I read about G5 and I felt, this was just a suspicion without clear evidence, nevertheless, the page was/has been deleted and I have been blocked from editing, I want to clearly state that I don't know who the user is, also since it has happened, I wish to still be able to contribute to Wikipedia, I have tried to read different guidelines so as not to fall short in my editings.. I plead my account be unblocked. LoneWrita (talk) 13:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Evidence was provided at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anniebisilolo and the sockpuppetry was determined to be likely. Simple denial is insufficient in this case. Yamla (talk) 14:28, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.