Lifelib

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kayode Otitoju.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Topher385 (talk) 15:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

Hello! Lifelib, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 08:26, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Kayode Otitoju, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SarahStierch (talk) 22:20, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

December 2015

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Love. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 05:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your message on my talk page. It is not just that the link you included is to a blog, although that is definitely a problem as far as Wikipedia is concerned. You also say on my talk page that you are the author of the blog you are quoting, which means you definitely should not be adding a link to your own blog, that is considered spam. More to the point, I would suggest that any number of writers have given definitions of love over the years. What makes yours worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia article? Wikipedia relies on reliable secondary sources, which I would suggest in this case means that other credible people would have had to have said (in [WP:RS|reliable sources]) that your definition is a particularly good or noteworthy one. Thank you, Melcous (talk) 23:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Kayode Otitoju for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kayode Otitoju is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayode Otitoju until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Melcous (talk) 00:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)