Welcome, and a caution

edit
Hello, LexLady13, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Orange Mike | Talk 19:28, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

March 2013

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ben Cline, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:28, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please remove Women's Rights section of Ben Cline

edit
 
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

As I indicated on your Talk page, the section on Ben Cline's page "Women's rights" was removed because it is disproportionately long and focuses entirely on legislation from the 2012 General Assembly session that Delegate Ben Cline did not chief patron. It is inconsistent with the rest of his page that focuses solely on legislation that Cline has chief patroned throughout his 6 terms in office, projecting a focus that is not big-picture and is, as a result, one-sided. Any legislation that Cline chief patroned that is relevant to the other existing categories would be relevant to the page, however, an entire section devoted to an area that he does not specialize in, unlike criminal prosecution and Interstate 81 issues, is not justified.

LexLady13 (talk) 00:17, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

You should provide this rationale at the article's talk page so others interested in that article can join the discussion. For what it's worth, I agree that the section seems overly long, but wholesale removal also doesn't seem appropriate. After all, it's the lone subsection on his legislative career that shows some news coverage. Huon (talk) 02:27, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply