User talk:Lcodyh803/Archive 4

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Lcodyh803 in topic SPAM

Jim Zeigler

edit

I don't understand it. I made several additions (not just the deletion) to Jim Zeigler's Wikipedia that included detailed citations. Now, every single one of them is gone. These were citations to newspaper articles and everything. Why on earth have they been removed? All the best. Belledoll (talk) 02:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Belledoll, I only undid your edits where you removed significant content from that page. As for the removal of your additions to the page, that would be a better question to ask Slywriter, as that was their decision. Lcodyh803 (talk) 02:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Re. Colon Lambert

edit

I think you have made a mistake. I have recently met and interviewed the man himself and he specifically quoted that this is correct. Please remove your edit. Sincerely, Ethan TurbobonesXKR (talk) 17:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sorry TurbobonesXKR, but the article of Colin Lambert is a Biography of a Living Person (BLP), and as such needs sources for all information added. If you had a source for this, I may not have reverted it, but the information itself was most likely not even relevant enough to warrant an addition anyways. Lcodyh803 (talk) 17:19, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

edit
 

Thanks for the work around here!

S0091 (talk) 00:12, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I appreciate it S0091! :) Lcodyh803 (talk) 00:19, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Revert

edit

I've reverted your edit to the Bibo Bergeron page because the source you use did not appear (based on Google Translate) to mention that he was arrested in 2020 (or even mention the number 2020), only that he was indicted in 2019. Do you have another source (even if it's not in English) that specifically mentions his arrest this year? Sakura CarteletTalk 21:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

That's fine with me Sakura Cartelet, I was reformatting the ref that an ip put in there - I should've paid closer attention to the source itself. Thank you! Lcodyh803 (talk) 21:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red

edit

Hi there, Lcodyh803, and welcome to Women in Red. You're joining at the right time as we have a year-long focus on sports. I see you have already created two biographies but you might still find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance.--Ipigott (talk) 10:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Perhap we can keep an eye

edit

...together on the PFP article where you just corrected the vandalism. I did the same earlier today, over two instances. I can watch for another couple of hours. You? Cheers. 2601:246:C700:19D:B160:B273:E4A3:8B0F (talk) 04:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Revert

edit

I put sources there by mistake and I did add those sources to article so you should read before REVERT. Thanks Nickayane99 (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nickayane99, this edit you made was unsourced in the article. Even if you did put the sources in the edit summary by mistake somehow, it's not my job to move them into the article. If you're going to make the edit, make sure you put the sources in correctly. Here is a guide to referencing. Lcodyh803 (talk) 19:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

The one confirmed case, a Chinese tourist, has recovered completely and is likely to be discharged soon, doctors at the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (IDH) said:[1] Can you see that, it's not your job to revert without reading properly.. If you're going to make the revert , make sure you read carefully and it's not my job to teach you how to read Nickayane99 (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nickayane99 All I'm saying is in the future be sure to cite correctly. No need to get snarky. See the link to the guide above to learn the citation guidelines. Lcodyh803 (talk) 19:58, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mina Kimes photo

edit

Hello.. I am new here but i have a screenshot of Mina telling me to change her picture to her twitter pic. is there any way we can make this permanent? she doesnt like the old pic that is on this website — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeryanfanaccount1 (talkcontribs) 22:18, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mikeryanfanaccount1 Whoever holds the copyright can use this copyright release generator to allow the picture on wikipedia. Until then do not add the picture back. Thank you. Lcodyh803 (talk) 22:46, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Carmine the snake

edit

I would have reverted the death entry, as well. For all I knew, it could have been a real snake. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate the comment, Arthur Rubin - at the time my thought was that someone had just added their dead snake to the list. But I'm glad someone fixed it, nevertheless. Lcodyh803 (talk) 02:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Changes to the National Association of State Credit Union Supervisors Page

edit

I am the Vice President, Communications at the National Association of State Credit Union Supervisors and I edited our page to update the current structure and organization. It appears you reverted back to the previous text. The changes I made reflect the accurate nature of our organization.

Shelton Roulhac, I reverted your edit because you removed the infobox, a reference, and added biased content. Unfortunately, the fact that you work at this association means that you have a conflict of interest. Editing articles about your employer is strongly discouraged. You may make uncontroversial edits, but your edit added biased content, so I have removed it. Lcodyh803 (talk) 19:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Understood. Is there anything I can do to ensure the accuracy of the page?

Shelton Roulhac, if there is something you feel should be changed, you can make a request on the article talk page, and an unbiased editor can choose to make the change for you. Be aware that edit requests for a major change without a reliable source are likely to be declined. Lcodyh803 (talk) 19:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Content removed

edit

Hello. An user can't understand the notability about some facts. Even if these facts are denied by Amanda Lear. Of course, I'm talking about Amanda Lear's page. These facts are sourced. Politicians or criminals deny informations wich are on Wikipedia. If sources exist, it can be on their pages. Lolamelody123456 (or whatever IPs of Lolamelody123456) continue to remove content. I'm not an English native speaker. So it's not easy to explain what I'm thinking about. But I notice on Lolamelody123456's talk page her habit to remove. I wish her to understand. How is it possible? Thank you. Best regards. Eliedion (talk) 22:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Eliedion, if there is a dispute on whether to include something in an article, it's best to bring it up on the article talk page. You should ping the editor you have a disagreement with, and have a discussion there. Lcodyh803 (talk) 22:35, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the GOCE!

edit

Hello Lcodyh803 and welcome to the Guild of Copy Editors (GOCE)! We are glad that you have decided to help us in our mission to improve the quality of writing on the English Wikipedia! Here are some links that you might find helpful to get started on your copy-editing journey!

You can help with copy-editing requests if you already have familiarity with the MOS and considerable English copy-editing skills, or start with articles tagged for copy editing to gain experience.

Thank you so much for joining the GOCE, we appreciate it!

For the GOCE, Puddleglum2.0 03:19, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Puddleglum2.0 01:20, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Puddleglum2.0‬! (the template is a little off, but I get the idea lol) Lcodyh803 (talk) 02:16, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ha! Messed up the spacing! Sorry about that, I should have fixed it. :D Your welcome for the welcome, thanks again for joining, we can always use more help! Puddleglum2.0 03:19, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020 at Women in Red

edit
 
March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159


Happy Women's History Month from all of us at Women in Red.

 
 
 

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

SPAM

edit

Margaret Thatcher has been quoted as saying "SPAM more like BAM" when she gave a speech about the quality of food the allied troops were eating — Preceding unsigned comment added by 52.144.57.248 (talk) 16:39, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Replied on their talk. Lcodyh803 (talk) 17:38, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply