You people that blocked me are being very mean here! Still declined? Ugh! New account! What?! I can’t make a new account because I’m blocked?! NO!

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
57   Spotted ratfish (talk) Add sources
99   Holocephali (talk) Add sources
117   Acanthodii (talk) Add sources
25   Glossary of ichthyology (talk) Add sources
12   Cladodont (talk) Add sources
39   National Biodiversity Network (talk) Add sources
9   Stethacanthidae (talk) Cleanup
19   Chiapas highlands (talk) Cleanup
53   Atlantic Northeast (talk) Cleanup
100   Neoarchean (talk) Expand
31   Kavirondo (talk) Expand
60   Germania Slavica (talk) Expand
168   Conodont (talk) Unencyclopaedic
36   The Sudans (talk) Unencyclopaedic
176   Aumakua (talk) Unencyclopaedic
130   Biomineralization (talk) Merge
52   South Polar region of the Cretaceous (talk) Merge
116   Terrestrial locomotion (talk) Merge
49   Semantic interoperability (talk) Wikify
250   Sichuan Basin (talk) Wikify
10   29th Training Systems Squadron (talk) Wikify
14   Addanki Dayakar (talk) Orphan
2   Alfred Legoyt (talk) Orphan
2   Asylet (talk) Orphan
19   Akmonistion (talk) Stub
2   Netsepoye (talk) Stub
12   First appearance datum (talk) Stub
21   Orthacanthus (talk) Stub
172   Semantic Scholar (talk) Stub
6   Pacific nurse shark (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:20, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Leaellyn Rich edit

Hello Last ditch effort,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Leaellyn Rich for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 11:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

--Last ditch effort (talk) 14:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)PUT IT BACK! PLEASE!Reply

February 2021 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Spinosaurus, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop treating articles' talkpages like social media.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day/February 2021. --Mr Fink (talk) 01:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Carnegie collection. --Mr Fink (talk) 19:39, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Newslinger talk 19:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Last ditch effort (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please. Last ditch effort (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archeria should be written like: Archeria is an eel-like anthracosaur which lived in the Early Permian. It was A medium-sized aquatic predator with a length of 2 m (7 ft).[1]

{unblock|reason=This is not disruptive editing. I promise I will edit less if you unblock me. Please unblock me. Last ditch effort (talk) 14:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)}Reply

{unblock|reason=Unblock me, please! Last ditch effort (talk) 14:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)}Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Last ditch effort (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Promise. Last ditch effort (talk) 14:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Making three unblock requests at a time is disruptive. And your suggested edit above is certainly not constructive. You'll get only one more chance at making an unblock request here, so I suggest you think carefully before doing so. Yamla (talk) 14:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.