Your submission at Articles for creation: Aali, Odisha has been accepted

edit
 
Aali, Odisha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

February 2018

edit

  Your addition to Kanika Palace has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Lourdes 12:04, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Hello Lalat14, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Aali, Odisha have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lourdes 12:05, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

February 2018

edit

  Your addition to Abdul Kalam Island has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Lourdes 12:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition to Pratap Keshari Deb has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Lourdes 12:16, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

PLEASE STOP!!!

edit

Please immediately stop adding copyright violations onto Wikipedia. You will be blocked if you try this once again. Please read up all the messages I have left for you and please ensure you read up on all the links contained within those messages to understand why ensuring that no copyright violations occur, is so important to us. Please ask me for any kind of assistance if you are unsure. But please immediately stop your copyright violations. Thanks, Lourdes 12:18, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

February 2018

edit

  Your addition to Draft:Pattamundai Block has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Lourdes 12:29, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Lourdes 12:37, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please don't copy material you find elsewhere

edit
 

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the law and the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:19, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pattamundai Block (March 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chenzw was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chenzw  Talk  04:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

VERY VERY IMPORTANT ANLYSIS's might seem like a mad 100% AI enabled ROBOT talking like after 30 years

edit

Hi this is my talk page. Please feel free leave a message sometimes.

1> Von new men

Pleasr read it with itnese care. I have not achieved anything yet. But i know that i know a lot more than normal beings around me. I have used all that i know/have from birth (genetically), by growing up with Indian/Hindu Knowledge (like tribal britisher's might have taken away our Books and destroyed any traces of from India, most crucial ones of them are still not abaileble openly, or have been interpeted as written/invented/discoverd by someone else mostly this greek/persian/Japanese/ Lalat14 (talk) 02:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Overlinking

edit

Hi there, please familiarise yourself with our guidelines on article linking. The purpose of a wikilink is to provide readers with more information about a subject they may not be familiar with. Since wikilinks compete with each other for a reader's attention, we do not link to common words or common concepts and we avoid duplicate wikilinks in articles, especially when they are in close proximity. Here and here you've kind of gone overboard with the linking. As a general rule of thumb, the question you should be asking is whether or not a person of average intelligence and English comprehension is going to know what ___ is. If the answer is yes, then please don't link.

Also, if you do link, please be sure you're linking to the correct article. If you link to [[Indian]], you point to this page, which is called a "disambiguation page". You should not be linking to disambiguation pages. You meant to point to [[India]]n, which would have taken you to India. However, in this edit at Blind man's bluff (poker), "Indian poker" doesn't refer to India, it refers to indigenous Americans. Same with this edit you made at Aboriginal Australians, where "Indian" probably does not refer to India. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:03, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm in Doubt

edit

Hello (talk). Thank you for your views. But, you need to understand that Indian's mean the people who come from near the Indus. Ancient britishrs were not fools. The had named indigenous people as Indians because they had similarities with the people from India. The american Indians and also the australian Indians. They all come from near the Indus. I would be glad if you try knowing if I'm correct. It will be of great help to me. Thank You ! Lalat14 (talk) 23:25, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Lalat14. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply