March 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Liberalism and centrism in Estonia with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:40, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

I am trying to move Liberalism in Estonia to Liberalism and centrism in Estonia but failed with this notice:

You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reason:
The page could not be moved: a page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid.
Please choose another name, or use Requested moves to ask an administrator to help you with the move.
Do not manually move the article by copying and pasting it; the page history must be moved along with the article text.

--Lawrence Alex 21:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Centrism in Hong Kong listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Centrism in Hong Kong. Since you had some involvement with the Centrism in Hong Kong redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 12:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Beijing MTR logo (logo only).png listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beijing MTR logo (logo only).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:57, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Chlorides template

edit

Could you please make The "Chlorides" template (and any other templates you manage) to be in the collapsed state by default? I would do it myself, but I could not figure out how to do that. Thanks... --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 00:39, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Glory to Hong Kong moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Glory to Hong Kong, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 17:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Glory to Hong Kong

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Glory to Hong Kong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster talk 17:23, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have added a few citations, but would like to encourage you to extend the article further. There seems to be lots of interesting background (but I am too slow in reading Chinese to be much help). In its current state, the article might be better off being merged into a generic article on the HK protests. Has anybody compared the song to Nothing to My Name (一無所有) yet? —Kusma (t·c) 19:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Glory to Hong Kong

edit

On 24 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Glory to Hong Kong, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some protesters have described "Glory to Hong Kong" as the unofficial national anthem of Hong Kong? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Glory to Hong Kong. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Glory to Hong Kong), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:02, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Custom signature fix needed

edit

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
  4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "Restore all default settings" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Click the Learn more button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
  3. Update your signature to fix the error.
  4. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Solution 3: Do nothing:

  1. In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now.

If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply