User talk:LAX/Archive 8

Latest comment: 16 years ago by GaryColemanFan in topic Backlash (2007)
LAX 
 "I reject your edits and substitute my own." | Talk Page ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ) | Contributions ( edit count )
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
← Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 →

Survivor Series '04

How 'bout tomorrow? Right now, I'm working on NWO '03. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks and I started this morning. Why?--TrUCo-X 01:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I guess we're both busy with a No Way Out.... PPV. ;) So, your going to work on the feuds and I'm going to work on the Event, for Survivor Series, right? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:10, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Didn't we say that, though? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I guess. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:16, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sure. Is "ThinkBlue" taken? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:33, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I left you a message over there. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

We are going to start it this Thursday, when a few of us are on vacation from school. First, I need Truco and Zenlax to vote. If I don't have their votes by Sunday, I'm going to have to more on to the next round. (The final round). iMatthew 2008 02:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

IP user User:194.82.224.20 has been doing nothing but vandalism. I gave him a final warning, but ignored me and continues to vandalize. iMatthew 2008 02:22, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. iMatthew 2008 02:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know. I gotta get off for the night. I have to be somewhere tomorrow morning, but from 1:30 p.m. until late night, I'll be on. I need to work on starting up the adoption with the user who left and adoption request on my talk page. (My first adoption). iMatthew 2008 02:34, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, its like a replica of Wikipedia?..TrUCo-X 02:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for that fix on my friend's page. I actually had it like that, for the design. But now that I see the other option, I'll keep it. lol. iMatthew 2008 12:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Actually I didn't copy it (weird). Now that you pointed it out, I realize it's the same. The list just got too long, so I tried two columns. iMatthew 2008 12:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Responded. iMatthew 2008 17:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Same here. iMatthew 2008 17:21, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Although, I wouldn't have a problem with his help on our next group projects, since it is all past and present members of The Kliq. iMatthew 2008 17:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Feel free to let him know, and that he should go vote, as well as you. =] iMatthew 2008 18:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
D.M.N. doesn't want to work on the project anymore. Can you do me a huge favor and ask bulletproof and NimiTize to vote on the Kliq's talk page. (as well as Blue). iMatthew 2008 19:12, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. It's only temporary for St.Patrick's Day. Btw, have you read [1]? iMatthew 2008 19:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
That's fine. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Done. Are you working on WM2000 by yourself? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ok. We have to most on though, we'll already have a PPV though when he gets back. (Since we start Thursday). Btw, we have seven contributors, we can have two on the background, two on the event, two on the aftermath, and one (or two if D.M.N. changes his mind) on fixing errors, adding sources, and making changes. iMatthew 2008 19:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
We can worry about that though when we pick the PPV. I'd like the event though. (half). If we have seven people expanding this, it will no doubt be a future FA. iMatthew 2008 19:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Good luck. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

You know, I love it that you use the going back edit. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:25, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I know, I'm glad its being used. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
That's fine. At least, its being represented right. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Morning LAX! I've been working on a new userpage for Blue. It's being worked on here. There are a few things that need to be added and put into subpages. Can you help me, making any fixes/changes that should be made? iMatthew 2008 12:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lol, that was two comments at like the same time. I can't believe that. And yet, we cannot review them. But nobody else will. Oy vey. iMatthew 2008 12:56, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I saw SummerSlam's talk page, and I'm not sure if thats a review, or just an editor expressing concerns. I might review another article today though, to shrink the list. Also, I have never made one edit (I believe) to SummerSlam 94. I believe that at least I should be able to review it, since I had nothing to do with it's nomination. Idk. iMatthew 2008 13:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Can you bring it up at WT:PW? iMatthew 2008 13:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well putting it up now, gives users the whole day to answer. iMatthew 2008 13:28, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Lol. Btw, we are still awaiting bulletproof and NimiTize's votes on our group project. iMatthew 2008 13:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm confused. I have new links added to the top of articles. Like on talk pages, it sayd (warn, arv, csd, last, rpp, xfd, and unlink). What are these? iMatthew 2008 14:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh. iMatthew 2008 14:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I believe the IP is edit warring at WWE Films and if I revert again, I believe it will be a 3RR violation. iMatthew 2008 15:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Holy shit, stupid me. This whole time I was under the impression that you can be blocked on your third edit. Now I get it. You can have three edits every 24 hours, then on the fourth you can be blocked right? Wow, I sound like a newbie. lol. iMatthew 2008 15:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Got it, thanks! lol. Btw, if you see Nimi or bulletproof online, please remind them to vote. iMatthew 2008 15:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
No, because this vote is for what ppv do you not want to do. So right now, Survivor Series is moving on to the final round. iMatthew 2008 15:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Lol, it's ok. Maybe I shouldn't have mentioned it. just kidding. SS06 is still my top pick. iMatthew 2008 15:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah. Then next round, we are voting for the PPV we want to do. iMatthew 2008 15:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

DJ Cammy

Why do you and others keep removing my comments and accusing me of vandalism without even paying attention TO WHAT IM ACTUALLY SAYING?

The page in question is about a 100% completely ficticious artist, not one piece of information in it have the slightest element of truth - yet why I attempt to bring it to the attention of those will full wikipedia accounts, you accuse ME of vandalism?

Please investigate this matter and arrange for this page to be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.183.80.133 (talk) 10:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Now cut that out!

Would you happen to know how the duration of vandal blocks is decided? (31 hours seems pretty peculiar to me...) Rochester (talk) 15:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Trekphiler (talk) 17:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Caleb

Thanks! I'll alert other users who have past history with him about this. D.M.N. (talk) 20:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, guess not. So, he's used Cowboycaleb1 + 2, so I guess I need to wait until Cowboycaleb3 appears on my radar. If the link does turn blue over night, just use your mop to get rid of the bug. D.M.N. (talk) 20:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Seems like he jumped to 6. Blocked indef. D.M.N. (talk) 13:15, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Kliq

(started new thread) It will end when bulletproof and Nimi vote. iMatthew 2008 15:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

If they don't vote by tomorrow, I'll close voting, and start the last round. iMatthew 2008 15:50, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah. iMatthew 2008 15:54, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nevermind, he's back. iMatthew 2008 16:54, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. iMatthew 2008 17:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Actually, I'll probably just start the next round of voting tonight. iMatthew 2008 17:54, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

But I'm not in the group anymore. NimiTize 19:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, ok. NimiTize 20:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've asked Blue to vote again, since SummerSlam is already moved on. Her vote will be the deciding vote for this round. iMatthew 2008 20:23, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
New signature? iMatthew 2008 22:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
No offense, but I think you should have stuck with LAX. You've established yourself as that. iMatthew 2008 22:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
When I think of Save Us (on wikipedia), I think of User:Kaiba who used to be Save Us 229. I honestly think you should stick with LAX. iMatthew 2008 22:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
There's good ol' LAX. lol. iMatthew 2008 22:49, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Even if he's ok with it, I think you should stick with LAX. iMatthew 2008 22:50, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok, in the meantime, can you help me source Matt Hardy's Single's career section? iMatthew 2008 23:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Btw, please start a new thread on my talk page. iMatthew 2008 23:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Btw....

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I award this barnstar to LAX for all of your hard work reverting vandalism. iMatthew 2008 23:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You deserve it. I mean it every time as well. lol. iMatthew 2008 23:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You don't sound like a dick. You deserve every one of them. iMatthew 2008 23:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
No, Survivor Series, but it's gone. iMatthew 2008 23:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sure I'd be delighted to work with you again. Just tell me when and where.-- bulletproof 3:16 01:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I prefer WrestleMania XV. I just happened to watch it this past Friday again.-- bulletproof 3:16 02:19, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Keep an eye on this user. iMatthew 2008 01:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
iMatthew, please assume good faith before implying to other users that I need to be watched. You don't even know me. I resent your POV comment about me. It is uncalled for. You could of at least assumed good faith which you clearly did not.CadenS (talk) 03:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Alleged Vandalism

I didn't vandalize anything. So don't send me your little smart alec messages about using the sandbox. If i cared enough i'd just write that thing you wasted your time deleting all over again and this time add a couple links to Youtube that has openings of the show to prove i was right. I probably won't do that though, since i don't care about what info is and isn't put on the pages nearly as much as some peoplr. Maybe i shouldn't call your remarks smart alec even though it's true, but it just annoyed me.--Axeman 10 (talk) 01:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're right, i didn't follow the policy as i should of. You didn't "annoy" me exactly, it just "annoys" me how people want to throw their weight around about content they're not familiar with. Youtube would be reliable in this case because there's like 3 or 4 intros to "The Main Event" that has SNME's generic intro music, and they're not all from the same user. So you can say "Oh, well they could of edited the music for a reason i can't think up right now", but all different users doing the same thing? Regardless, if i cared enough, i could search enough to find a reliable source. But a few extra words doesn't mean anything to me right now. One day in the future i may do that, but not now. I'm interested in the copyright infringement with Youtube and WWE you mentioned though, so if you would, tell me a little more about it. --Axeman 10 (talk) 01:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I wasn't thinking when i brought up Youtube, but that's where i found it out about the intro music. Have you watched an episode by disc or something, to make you believe that i was wrong about the intro? Also, if later on idecide to do this and post links to reliable and legal sources, there won't be any problems, right? --Axeman 10 (talk) 01:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your time and consideration. Hopefully now you don't view me as a pest. --Axeman 10 (talk) 01:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done. NimiTize 01:32, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Happy St. Patrick's Day


iMatthew


Wishes You A



HAPPY


ST. PATRICK'S


DAY
I do, I made a mistake, but it's fixed now. I thought u wanted to do SS as well??--TrUCo-X 14:19, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
What's up with the whole "Y2J" thing? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, well I guess it will. Any other PPV you would want to work on together?TrUCo-X 22:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sure. It's funny how I also had the game. This one should be interesting.TrUCo-X 22:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well I don't mind, IYO, which do I better the event or the background, check SummerSlam (2000) for example.TrUCo-X 23:06, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yup. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:11, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh. Would you like to be "known" as Triple H or Chris Jericho? For the Kliq page. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
IMO, the BG, so yeah now that thats settled, want to start now?TrUCo-X 23:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Really? Are you open to any suggestions? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:25, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright.TrUCo-X 23:28, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, not right now. Are you planning on changing your name, like, now or later? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm. Not to sound like a "dick", but wouldn't there be a confusion between you and him? If he agrees to "give" you the name. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, well I don't know what to say. Do you want your name to be wrestling-related? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Really? How 'bout Y2J fan? IDK. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
It was worth a shot. ;) How's WM2000? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:15, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
No, the "article". --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Interesting. Are we still on to work on Survivor Series? When you come back --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:24, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just checkin'. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, this guy keeps adding the "theme" song for this years Backlash and I've warned him. What should be done? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:36, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rollback

Hi. hin111 blanked this page; I did a rollback. Bye, MOJSKA 666 (msg) 19:52, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

User:Hin111

Do you think User:Hin111 is good enough for a block? He blanked your page once (Which I just reverted, and gave him a only/final warning), your talk page twice and Randy Orton's talk page once. NimiTize 20:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

OMG, the IP will not stop vandalizing the WWE Films page, please block again. iMatthew 2008 01:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE:Hornet

Yeah, I'm seeing if I can get some more information on this. It isn't like him to be this obvious anymore. As always, be vigilant. Cheers, SexySeaBass 22:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm glad to hear that. Bulletproof and I have had contact with him for months, so we have a bit more information than anyone else assuming we successfully sifted through what was a lie and what wasn't, and bulletproof may have even met him in person. However, that doesn't matter at this point. The information is only relevant to the status of his ban, which is unanimously supported at this point. You know what to look for, and what to expect from him in regards to sockpuppetry. I'm not on much anymore, but when I am I'll be keeping watch as well. Peace, SexySeaBass 22:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 11 13 March 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
Accusations of financial impropriety receive more coverage Best of WikiWorld: "Five-second rule" 
News and notes: New bureaucrat, Wikimania bids narrowed, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Vintage image restoration WikiProject Report: Professional wrestling 
Tutorial: Summary of policies Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 12 17 March 2008 About the Signpost

Best of WikiWorld: "The Rutles" News and notes: Single-user login, election commission, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Changes at peer review 
WikiProject Report: Tropical cyclones Tutorial: Editing Monobook, installing scripts 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Help on PCCA

Can you tell me how i would go about requesting a partial block on PCCA. The page is getting bombed to death by vandals. Thanks for the help. Saksjn (talk) 19:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you are still thinking of a username, how about BreakDownTheWalls or BDTW. iMatthew 2008 20:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I seriously think there would be to much confusion. iMatthew 2008 20:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Also, can you please give WWE Films Semi-Protection. IP's keep vandalizing it. iMatthew 2008 20:43, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
 Done iMatthew 2008 20:51, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oops. Thanks for fixing that. iMatthew 2008 20:56, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hey, is this image good for Hornswoggle's article? I took it a few months ago at an autograph session. iMatthew 2008 21:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
It can be enlarged on Wikipedia. Can you upload it, or do I have to? iMatthew 2008 21:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cross Posted

The Kliq's project has been chosen, SummerSlam (2001). Please go to The Kliq's talk page and add your name to the part of the PPV you would like to do. Also, if you have not done so, please add The Kliq to your watchlist, so you can keep an eye on the things going on. Cheers! iMatthew 2008 23:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Is Y2J going to save us? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
No, I was just wondering. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:28, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nice. ;) So, are you gonna have a "new" page layout or leave it as it is? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. iMatthew 2008 01:38, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh, that's cool. Sorry for even asking about the page layout. Hey, do you think we might ever get to Survivor Series? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
It's ok. iMatthew 2008 01:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
No, I was just wondering if we we're still on. But, like you said, after SummerSlam, I guess. And Matt, wth? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
What a terrible thing Matt said. ;) But yeah, I accept your change. Are you gonna request the change? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, it reminds me of when I was Zero and I didn't want to change to Blue. I understand how you feel. ;) Hey, IDK if your in the mood or not, but can you update Judgment Day 2005? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, its cool. ;) I guess I'll let someone else do it. Thanks for trying, though. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nope, I don't think he wants to talk to me, so.... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright, will do. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup

STORMTRACKER 94 Go Irish! 22:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reply

Don't sweat it dude, its ok ;) and thanks for telling me. And whats with your new SAVE_US gimmick? NimiTize 01:53, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

So your changing your username too? NimiTize 02:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, Its your choice but It think you sould stick with LAX. NimiTize 02:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Lol, but like I said its your choice. You had LAX for a long time now. NimiTize 02:16, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well first let me break the code and try to figure out who this is...wait for it..5, 4, 3, 2, 1---LAX..lol

Umm, is it ok if I do the WCW Championship and WCW Tag Championship feuds?--TrUCo-X 15:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I guess the Hardy/RVD feud is a sort of major considering it was a ladder match. TrUCo-X 14:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Are you going to change your name to fit your new sig? And ok, I already did the WCW title feud, go over it if you want.TrUCo-X 18:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh ok.--TrUCo-X 18:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

User:71.194.197.64

This user JUST got over a 24 hour ban and is already vandalizing multiple pages again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/71.194.197.64. Can you help? TJ Spyke 22:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For all your hardwork on reverting vandalism. NimiTize 21:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You deserve it ;) NimiTize 21:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Adminship

Uh, the reason it failed was because the way I answered the questions. And the moment caught me with nervousness and stuff. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

IDK. Right now, I really need to study these policies again. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey "Y2J"

I have a question I dont want to be annoying but, Can I use my barnstar page the way you put it (2 by 2), because I changed it the way it views, then I happened to vist your barnstar page to count the 25 barnstars (You told me you had 25), and relized it was the same way as mine, can I keep it the way it is, or if its not fine by you, its fine by me, I'll change it back. NimiTize 02:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks ;) NimiTize 13:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 17:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The APA

I AM REALLY REALLY SORRY TO BOTHER YOU IN THIS WAY, but...How does it look? And can this image and/or this one and or/ this one be uploaded? Also why can't these be copied from their location?TrUCo-X 18:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, can you review a GA tonight? Either 2007 Kansas City Chiefs season or Skip Holtz would be great. iMatthew 2008 22:25, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Its ok! iMatthew 2008 22:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 13 24 March 2008 About the Signpost

Single User Login enabled for administrators Best of WikiWorld: "Clabbers" 
News and notes: $3,000,000 grant, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Banner shells tame talk page clutter WikiProject Report: Video games 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Grammar trout?

Are you sure of [2]? The grammar sounds weird (2 verbs in the same sentence). I am not 100% sure since I am not a native speaker :) -- lucasbfr talk 09:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't see any problem with the change. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 09:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
OK I trust both of you :). "Were this user is to" just sounded weird to my ears. -- lucasbfr talk 09:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thats no problem! But It's good to have you back, LAX. iMatthew 2008 10:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I believe so, I'm just touching up a few things. iMatthew 2008 10:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
What happen, you got bored with Y2J? Fallen Angel 13:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, I'm thinking about changing my username, but like 72% in my mind is telling me to stick with Nimi. Fallen Angel 15:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yea I was kinda thinkin the same, so far 1-0, I will ask Blue on her option, if she says no, I'll switch back, if she says yes, I'll mabye keep. Fallen Angel 15:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Backlash

Hello LAX, I haven't heard from you. I hope everything is well with you. I would like to get your opinion on adding Backlash (2004) to the project's waiting list. Zenlax T C S 20:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your right, I think we should insert it to a Peer review first. Would you like to do that now or wait a while? As I see you have your complete focus on SummerSlam (2007). Zenlax T C S 20:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I see. So, does that mean you would like to post-pone the peer review? Zenlax T C S 20:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree. iMatthew 2008 23:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
It's been more than ready. iMatthew 2008 00:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WM2000

Well, i'll see if I can finish it if not I will put it up for grabs, but i understand.TrUCo-X 14:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

No problem.--TrUCo-X 14:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, mayby you didn't notice, but above I asked you about images for The APA, if possible may you respond? =-]
Congrats, was about time the article got reviewed. What's your next GA? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
OMG, I was too. He kept on insisting that I change "Raw" to "RAW" and I was not going to make the change. But, whatever. Did you write One Night Stand? Oh, I sent you an e-mail. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I know. Isn't he part of PW, though? Oh, that's cool. Hey, since Jeff Money was blocked, we can take SummerSlam '06 and see if we can get it to GA. Opinion? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, cause he wrote Survivor Series '06 and fixes everything at the PPV section. SummerSlam, we can wait on that, as you said it needs to be re-written, so we can work on Survivor Series '04, before Diamonds takes it. How does that sound? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sure, right now I gotta work on HBK's lead so the article can become an FA. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Awesome. ;) And, what happen to your "SAVE.US" thing? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:13, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh, that's cool. Well, NWO just failed FA.... again. If your confident the article is written well, go and nominate it for FA. But, you gotta let the PW people know, before they come and give you crap. ;) P.S. Do you like my page layout? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, you do write good articles and seeing an FA to your resumé will be a cool thing to have. ;) Oh, thanks for liking my page design. I sorta miss my old one, though. :( --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Suggest you...

Look at the very bottom topic at the WP:PW talkpage. Before moving onto working on any new PPV articles, I suggest you read the bottom topic. Just letting ya know. D.M.N. (talk) 15:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

RVD

Hey there. I don't know how that edit ended up with my name on it. It was on there earlier this morning, I reverted it because it was in the wrong section and not very notable, and I went back to verify it, and it was gone. I have no idea why it says I did it.  Hazardous Matt  20:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sigh. Nevermind. I read it a little too quick and saw that someone undid a revision I had done, and for some reason thought it miscredited me as the person adding the info. Disregard my above...rantyness.  Hazardous Matt  20:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: SummerSlam FA

I don't see why not, your article looks a hell of alot better than NWO. Your's has a better chance of passin then NWO had. Also does Over the Edge (1999) looks good for GAN? This is such an important event, an I want it to become a GA and then a FA.TrUCo-X 14:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't see why not. The article reads good and I think it will help out for future Feature Articles. Zenlax T C S 19:25, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Don't let tempers flair, just try to reason with the reviewer. Also, I think it me be helpful to bring another project member to see if the reviewer is bringing up problems for no apparent reason. As for the response you left, I recommend going through the same procedure you did with SummerSlam. Zenlax T C S 19:37, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Notifying the project members of your task with SummerSlam. If you receive no replies, withing a certain time, I guess you have a choice of nominating the article with or without responses from the project. Zenlax T C S 19:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Good, I was starting to think I was making no sense whatsoever. Also, I've added a peer review to Backlash and left a message at the project. Hope I did a good job on placing a peer review. Zenlax T C S 19:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Your welcome, and I asked Zenlax he said its ready. I also announced it for GA yesterday, so I will nominate it next thursday or friday.TrUCo-X 20:02, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


stop following me

stop following me and redoing every edit i do i was right on mcmahon whats next rvd page look we all have our right some opne could be doing somthing based on world champions and get it wrong as mcmahons only a 1 time wolrd champion check list of pwi world champions and thats finaly i'm putting it right stop stop putting it wrong —Preceding unsigned comment added by Devil Thunderbolt (talkcontribs) 20:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

hop u don't mind then ive put rvd as a two time world champion see if it gets deleted if it dose mcmahon stays how i put it however if this stays on rvds page then we will keep it on mcmahons i think that this is a fair way to settle this disagreement don't you even though on other wrestling articals is dont count the ecw title or official it isent a world title we should put he is an unofissial champion —Preceding unsigned comment added by Devil Thunderbolt (talkcontribs) 20:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

right this is gett ridicklus stop editing everything i edit your not the owner of wikipedia and i feel that u are arrasing me every edit i make guess whos undone it ..... you look i'm gonna report this if it continues hopeful we can work this out i'm studing wrestling and most of the info i put up is usful to me and my mates who are also studing wrestling KCDavis (talk) 20:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

it like this man i want to wrestle so i'm studing and have found a lot of info on wikipedia but info that i have have found helpful ive added for others but you delete them and so u patrol wrestling articls then why when i put rvd was a two time world champ it was deleted twice see pwi is not everthing to due with wrestling but they have the power to make championships have world title staus and u may not like that but its the truths there things i dont like on some pages but its important to others thats why i dont delete it so just leave info alone on pages that i edit cuz i'm feeling herassed and if i kept reverting edits u did u wont like it but i wont cuz this is not just for me and who cares about rvd beeing the logest hardcore champion under the 24/7 rule this lasted 90 days thats only 7 less then the logest reging one so its important KCDavis (talk) 21:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)7Reply

Right this is stupied rvds page dose not say 2 time world champion vinces dose why i have reported u as i fell very harresed and can not edit any articl without U! beeing the one reverting it u are targiting me so please stop it i am right in saying mcmahon has holded two title with world in there name however only one is official the other is not get not nowhere is this official if it was i would leave since ive started edit u have made it very hard this is not a treat of angry comment this is say LEAVE ME ALONE right

i fixed vince it covers both our points so its fair so insted of us haveing what only one want ive put both of our topics there and yea i felt that last one a treat please dont anymore and 1 quick questio how come when i put rvd was a two time world champion it was quickly removed thanks for your time KCDavis (talk) 21:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Back

I've been gone for a few days, and probably will not be back full time until sometime next week. Btw, I see you've taken Armageddon. Do you mind if I write the event with/for you? I was actually planning on working on it sometime in the near future. Also, I'm letting you know that after Hardy/Kendrick/Lesnar/Rated-RKO go through GAN, I will finish RR 04. While they are are nominations, I'll finish the event for SS 01, and maybe Armageddon. After these are done, I'm probably going to take a break of PPV's and work on getting a few other articles to GA. iMatthew 2008 00:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yup, adding an FA to your "resumé" would be a cool thing to add. ;) Um, the reason I miss my old page is because its hard to get use to the new page, as I spent a 1½ with my "original" page. Hey, let's write Survivor Series in a sandbox, before you know who, takes it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:22, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Um, I say yours, if you have one available. Do you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I'll write the first half. You have to talk to Truco about that, or get somebody to switch with you. Otherwise, your leaving Truco with the entire Background by himself. iMatthew 2008 00:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Awesome, I'll add the info. into it. ;) Man, we never got around Armageddon like we said. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
No problem! iMatthew 2008 00:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Since I've never done is before, can you do me a favor and look at Royal Rumble (2004), and tell me which matches I need to write about for the background and aftermath. Or is it just every feud? iMatthew 2008 00:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
'04. '06 has been taken. :( --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
No, we can work on SS '02 later. I'm talking about SS '04. 'Member? Oh, I would like to work on the aftermath, if the job is still available. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:45, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I thought you were still talking about Survivor Series. But yeah, I was referring to '06, cause you and I planned on working on it. Cool, then. Just, let me know when you guys have the background and event and I'll write the aftermath. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Congrats. ;) I'm aiming to get my fourth GA and possibly my fifth. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:07, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

OMG, don't say that. I don't think I can bare the idea of it failing again. Not to sound like a dick or whatever, but I have confidence that it will pass. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I know. Your gonna help, right? When the review comes in. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've responded. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
'Nother message. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Replied. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know. I've replied. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Replied. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:18, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Very true on the articles. Hope you got my reply. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You sure? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
No, I got it and replied. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Who knows. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
There's a 50-50 chance. Jeez, he's busy. I sorta wish he can give Unforgiven '04 the pre-FA thing. Thank God you and I only work on PPV's. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:06, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I know. IDK about you, but I'd be working on wrestler's articles. You probably know which ones. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yup. But, I'm not sure on Shane McMahon's article, though. Its been a long time since I've added something. Hey, do you think you can help out Truco with an image? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Its for the APA article, it needs an image. Truco wants this image to be in the article. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hold on, let me read it. Hey, do you know who wrote Unforgiven '07? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah. I sorta want to re-write it, since your working on New Years Revolution '06. Okay, the part about Undertaker having the advantage over Mark Henry in that one match, is that really necessary about him "overpowering" him? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, that's the only thing I got from the background part. Is it cool with you if I fix the ref. order for NWO? I don't think I'd be much of help for the EC feud, since I wasn't watching Raw at the time. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I know. I just didn't want to have an "edit conflict". ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, if you remove that info. about Undertaker's "powering". Didn't you have that for SummerSlam, when Cena took the upper hand over Carlito? But, on the Randy Orton and Rey feud, is it important about how Mark Henry and Kurt Angle abandoned the match and left Orton and Rey on their own? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright. That's what just came to mind, though. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, after I'm done with the EC, Hardy's and Dudley's feud for WM2000. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not yet. I haven't heard from you-know-who. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, you-know-who hasn't responded because of something. see talk page. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
That's the plan. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
How 'bout after I'm done with the EC, H and D feud for WM'00. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:04, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm almost done and I'll do my "mission". --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nope. Cause, I didn't start on that feud and I really want to fix Unforgiven '07. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know, but I don't feel like working on that. I want to work on something that I want to work on. Not to show off or whatever, but if Vengeance '05 passes GA, it'll be the first GA that two people have worked on. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Really? (To Blue's above comment) iMatthew 2008 19:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I think. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know. :P iMatthew 2008 19:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Wait, WM3 was a "COTW". I think that's very different from two people working on an article. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I guess if you...look at it that way. iMatthew 2008 19:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

NEVER MIND. And no, Nikki, Deep Shadow and Naha helped out with it too. True, but are they GA candidates? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

My point, they all helped out. iMatthew 2008 19:54, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Matt, I was talking about the PPV's. Hey, LAX, I'm going for "it" right now. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
My bad. LOL. iMatthew 2008 19:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Actually, I appreciate it. Let's see what happens. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You got it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh. I did, however, sent you an e-mail. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Replied. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
As well as me. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
'Nother. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Tres? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Two more. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I took to long. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Same here. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:36, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You said it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:55, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Replied. BTW, please start a new thread. –Cheers, LAX 22:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

SS 2001

Hey, its ok. Don't worry, I'll just do it. But it is a "group" effort.--TrUCo-X 00:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, and I believe you didn't cheat, but before you get your award, please e-mail me and tell me where you found the link. If you didn't find the link, you cheated. :P iMatthew 2008 01:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've replied, and whatever. iMatthew 2008 01:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
iMatthew's Secret Page Barnswoggle
This user has found iMatthew 2008's secret page! Can you find it..without cheating?
I don't really care, sorry. Your welcome for the award. iMatthew 2008 01:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I will, when I finish everything on my Current list. iMatthew 2008 11:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Prowrestling.wikia

I decided to check out the recent changes on there, and some user has uploaded tons of images in violation of copyright laws, and inserted them into articles. You're probably going to have to bot rollback him, and you have a lot of work ahead of you in clearing out those images. Cheers, SexySeaBass 03:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Alright, cool, just so long as it gets taken care of. Cheers, SexySeaBass 03:24, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, from the ones I looked at they're all WWE images, and as such it is breaking the law to not delete them. The rules about fair use materials that apply here also apply there. However, do try to make sure the user doesn't quit over it, as difficult as that will be. Cheers, SexySeaBass 14:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

SmackDown's move to MyNetworkTV

Listen, I understand that you have put a hidden message in the code that says "don't add", but I feel that citing MyNetworkTV as the new network within that area of the page is valid. After all, WWE has formally announced that SmackDown! will be on that network. The deal is signed. It's official. Don't you think it would be beneficial to show where the program is going? When I go to a Wiki page about a television show I'm interested in, that area is usually the first place I look. I was under the assumption that Wikipedia was for information, and citing MyNetworkTV is doing just that: informing a WWE fan that the show will be there in the fall. Just a thought... (P.S. I wasn't experimenting. I made a mistake.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bat86 (talkcontribs) 09:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

So...since there is this consensus amongst the project to not add it, that means that someone like me can't touch the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bat86 (talkcontribs) 09:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Listen, I'll be straight with you. I'm not trying to be hostile or start a fight. I'm just saying that the project doesn't own the article. If an editor makes a LEGITIMATE change to an article (and the move to MyNetworkTV is legitimate), it should stay. It is not right or fair for the project to dictate whether or not a proven fact is allowed in an article. If I try to submit something false, by all means, nix it. But I was just trying to submit a proven fact (I believe the move is even cited at the bottom of the article). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bat86 (talkcontribs) 10:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Where can I find that talk page? Either way, I will revert it. I'm not trying to be rebellious, but Wikipedia is the place where "anyone can edit". I'm not vandalizing. I'm not trying to make a point within the article. I'm just wanting a true fact in the article. I appreciate your patience, and I hope that you understand why it should be there. Bat86 (talk) 10:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay. I have discussed it. I have stated my argument, and it is there clear as day. What else do I have to do to make that submission stick? Honestly, I don't know if I want to edit on Wikipedia anymore because it seems that censorship is running rampant on the pro wrestling articles (no offense). Bat86 (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Honestly, there has only been one objection to my submission...from a member of your project...an administrator. I'm sorry, please don't take offense to this, but it seems to me that if something is put in the article that you don't want there, you nix it, and that is especially absurd in this situation considering the submission is FACTUAL. But, if I have to wait for the consensus, so be it. But, I am expecting that the consensus is going to decide against the submission because the "almighty project" doesn't want it there, for God knows why. I don't see how it hurts the information. I only see improvement. Bat86 (talk) 10:36, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate that you see that I'm not trying to stir things up. I'm a daily visitor of Wikipedia (seriously). I come here all the time, and I have always wanted to work with the various editors to continue this thing. I would never try to vandalize or screw up someone else's work. I just want to share what little (lol) knowledge I have. I will wait for another opinion before I revert it again. I just hope that I can work with you guys, as I am a lifelong wrestling fan. If you have any other input on what I can do or need my help in any way (although my Wiki-knowledge is limited), please don't hesitate to ask. I am viewing the Hall of Fame ceremony and WrestleMania XXIV this weekend. If you need any help with those articles as well, please include me. Thanks again, and I'm sorry if I have offended you or anyone else. Bat86 (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, I hadn't really thought that outright, but quite possibly... Bat86 (talk) 10:55, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Def. In short, yes. But if you want, can you wait till after I nominate Triple H 2morro or on April 4? NimiTize 17:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright bro. NimiTize 17:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

SummerSlam (2007)

Can't see why not. However, I do feel you have gone a little bit of "references overkill" in most of the background section. IMO, you really only need one reference for a single point, in my view you don't need two references for every single point, unless it is something the reader is more than likely to challenge. D.M.N. (talk) 18:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's OK. I can't see the point of two references in the same place if there telling the same thing. D.M.N. (talk) 18:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
It shouldn't affect the FAC. Oh, have you noticed what's going to be on the front page tomorrow as TFA? D.M.N. (talk) 18:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Something else about SummerSlam: You need to say in the Aftermath how the PPV was recieved, whether people thought it was good or totally crap. You'll also need to mention the buyrate, and how it relates to previous years. For D2D, that was quite easy for me, as the PPV, was well shit. :D
I'll scout round for a few refs to help you with that if you wish! :) D.M.N. (talk) 19:23, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You also DEFINITELY need to say in the background that Jackass were going to be involved in angles, but were later dropped[3] (without things like that, IMO it won't unfortunately become an FA)

Sources

  • SLAM! Sports - Gives the event a rating of 6.5/10 (Highest match rating 7.5/10 for WWE title match, ECW title match & Rey/Chavo; Lowest match rating 1/10 for World title)

That's the only one I oculd find, but there are probably more lurking about. Also, you need to note that ten superstars were suspended just days after the event (which affected future storylines).[4] Quote from article: "On September 7 edition of SmackDown!, Mysterio defeated Chavo Guerrero in an "I Quit" match." - you need to note this was to get Chavo off TV due to the suspension.

Hope this helps. D.M.N. (talk) 19:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Many were taken off TV for the month, and that needs to be noted in the article. I'm only telling you now, because I don't really want to see in the FAC having someone see "I thought Jackass was meant to be involved", "weren't several people suspended days after" etc, which could send the FAC down the pan. D.M.N. (talk) 19:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nope, that source doesn't look reliable IMO. You could use this though. You might want to say, that a lot of people were against the angle. D.M.N. (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

This seems OK for another reviewer. It's not exactly reliable, but it represents an opinion, which is needed when going for a review. D.M.N. (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yep. Here's another report/rant on the event. For most of the PPV rant, there is quite a bit of swearing, so just a little warning. :) D.M.N. (talk) 15:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sorry. :( It worked absolutely fine for me. I would say try going on it again, but don't know whether you want to risk it. :( D.M.N. (talk) 16:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
We do actually use Lords of Pain in quite a few of our articles. If you wish, I'll copy and paste the details of that source underneath here so you can see it. D.M.N. (talk) 16:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
WrestlingRevealed source can be used for Khali/Batista. Would it be better if I made a post with these sources at the SummerSlam 2007 talkpage so we don't get all confused? :)) D.M.N. (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done. I've moved the sources and stuff to the talkpage, hopefully I've set it out better than I did here! :D D.M.N. (talk) 17:08, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not really. I already got a source to cover that, didn't I? D.M.N. (talk) 17:19, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Very nice. I made one little change, and that was "storyline" instead of "storylines". I think they were only intended to be in one storyline, therefore the "s" is not needed. I've reworded some things as well as removing a ref that I didn't think was needed. Good work, D.M.N. (talk) 18:51, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
OK. However, first off there are other (minor) things which need sorting. BTW, the Khali/Batista bit is very good too. IMO, there is way to much wikilinking, discounting the lead and the results section, things are only meant to be linked on first notice. I did this in December to Dismember (2006) and several other articles I've worked this, and it is recommended in the MOS. If you wish, I will go through the article, and remove duplicate wikilinks. Also, after a first mention of a person in a section e.g. John Cena, they should only be mentioned by their last name again in that section e.g. Cena. D.M.N. (talk) 18:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I think so. It depends on what the first sentence is, I think. Anyway, can I go ahead, and remove duplicate Wikilinks? D.M.N. (talk) 19:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Plans...

What are you planning on getting done tonight? Can you review an article at GAN? iMatthew 2008 22:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I plan on working on Armageddon '06, Survivor Series '04, and New Year's Revolution '06. –Cheers, LAX 22:19, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
=[ can you reply on my page instead of here, it's easier than having to check your talk page for a reply. And do you need help with anything? iMatthew 2008 22:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Survivor Series '04

Yeah, I know. Its, sort of sad. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It is. I just think he needs to relieve his "wikistress." –Cheers, LAX 23:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, I have your "page" on my watchlist, but not your talk page, but I've added it. Anyways, why is he doing that, though? Also, when do you want to work on Survivor Series? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:06, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
He said he as been recieving alot of criticism lately, and that it is the right thing for him to do. I told Matt that I would be working on it tonight. –Cheers, LAX 23:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, well. Hey, remember when Truco wanted to do the same? Hey, are we working on the usual for SS? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I thought that is what we decided. –Cheers, LAX 23:31, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Just wanted to check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Matt told me that he is thinking about leaving Wikipedia for good. –Cheers, LAX 23:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
WTF? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you read the conversation between the two of us, you'll find out more. –Cheers, LAX 23:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, Lord have mercy on our souls. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I told him that he just needs to take a break to relieve his stress, but apparently he did not listen. –Cheers, LAX 23:54, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
E-mail time. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

This never happened. I'm back. iMatthew 2008 00:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Then why did you place the banner on your page and tell me you were leaving? Blue, I have replied. –LAX 00:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I was in a horrible mood and even taking it out on my family. I went way out of line, and LAX I really apologize. It had nothing to do with you, I'm very, very sorry! iMatthew 2008 00:05, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I can understand, but if this happens again, please take a break and keep a cool head. –LAX 00:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
This will never happen again, I promise. I hope that you can forgive me so we forget this. iMatthew 2008 00:08, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I forgive you, I just hate when anger is taken out on me for no reason. –LAX 00:09, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Same here. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
LAX, I'm so, very, extremely sorry! Very sorry. iMatthew 2008 00:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I understand. We all have stress, and when stress from outside Wikipedia and wikistress combine, it's not a good thing. –LAX 00:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You got it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Question

You like it better responding here? NimiTize 23:24, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I like it so I can follow my discussions with other users. BTW, if you haven't done so already, please add my talk page to your watchlist. –Cheers, LAX 23:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
It will take me a while to get used to this.. NimiTize 00:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Same here. ;) –LAX 00:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hey is it against a policy to change your username in the same month?--3L VaK3r0 00:55, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not to my knowledge; however, I doubt you'll get you're name changed (unless it's for personal reasons). –LAX 01:02, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ohh, I guess I'll just leave it as so...--3L VaK3r0 01:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
And what does your sig represent? –LAX 01:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nothing really. Just a nickname, similar to Truco, mostly a variation of Wisin & Yandel's album entitled Los Vaqueros. Also, isn't their a template out there where when you reply here, the template get's sent to the person (you are talking to)'s talk page?3L VaK3r0 01:09, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wow, you wanted Truco-X badly, now you want to change it? (No offence). NimiTize 01:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

He's a "cowboy". --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Truco: Yeah, but I don't think it is sent automatically. Also, who is going to retire after WrestleMania (referring to your edit summary on WrestleMania XXIV)?
Blue: Who is a cowboy? –LAX 01:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Truco. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:19, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You know that Wikipedia is not a news site and stuff right "Truco"? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Hall of Fame was awesome and sad. THE ROCK OWNED!!! IT DOSENT MATTER WHAT YOUR NAME IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL, Chris Jericho gets up when Rock makes fun of him LOL. Ric Flair vs Shawn Michaels 2morro....Ughh.. Michaels I want you to win, but then again its a big match for Flair. Anyway, nite bro. NimiTize 04:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, but I didn't publish anything on the mainspace, this is on a talk page.--3L VaK3r0 04:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
The Hall of Fame was awesome and The Rock definitely owned. –LAX 11:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Absolutely, The Rock owned Santana..San Franciso..lol--3L VaK3r0 18:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know, his whole spot was hilarious. –LAX 18:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I miss you.

I do. Really. Hey, are you Latino? I'm Greek! Um, sorry. mY life got stressful once again. I see i'm not your friend no more. Do you hate me now? How sad. Oh well. No one likes me no more! Cool. Now I can fly under the radar! Tech43 (talk) 04:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

To me it reads well, but lets see what occurs during its FAC, good luck.--3L VaK3r0 18:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I think those were the people at NWO's FAC..I first want OTE 99 to pass its GAN and then its FAC, and then I will retire (mayby)--3L VaK3r0 18:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah. Too much stress..Or I'll be like The Hybrid..--3L VaK3r0 18:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)--3L VaK3r0 18:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah I have. Wiki is interfering in my life too much. I'll just come back here and then.3L VaK3r0 18:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Mostly because Im in school, and this is too much. R.I.P Truco..lol3L VaK3r0 18:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ill sum up my response to your comment in three letters...WTF?'''3L VaK3r0 18:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'll be back. I just wont be here everyday, mayby once a month. 3L VaK3r0 19:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Eventually I will return full time, dont worry now, I probably will retire in August or November later this year..3L VaK3r0 19:14, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You still want me to do it? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:20, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes, so we know how they feel. Also, do you think that the paragraph about the Jackass involvement reads well? –LAX 22:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Will do. Hold on, let me read it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Um, instead of having "between", replace it with involving the cast of Jackass..... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Um, I think between is the right word to be used. –LAX 23:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Just sayin'. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, so far the show has been great. You? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I feel bad for Ric Flair, but it needed to happen, though. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Didn't I tell you guys, I almost had tears. WOOOOO!--3L VaK3r0 01:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I sorta felt the tention last night in the HoF. But you know what, Shawn has lost too many matches at WM, he needed to win this one. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Flair for SmackDown! GM!..lol WOOO! He'll be back eventually as a GM or a manager.--3L VaK3r0 01:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, but you have to admit, he is aged. He's not like Mae Young, who wants to wrestle at 100..--3L VaK3r0 01:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
IDK exactly, but its pretty bad. Especially for Mr. WrestleMania. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yup, you said it. ;) Sort of can't wait 'til the Triple Threat match. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I know. I tried adding the exact time Batista defeated Umaga, I didn't get it in, because of the "edit conflict". Seriously, man. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hallelujah!!! --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know, man. Praise the Lord. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Dude, I'm pissed as Hell. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:50, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Orton. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm neutral; I don't like him as a champion. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:16, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
2% for Triple H. I wanted Cena to win. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:19, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

True, but you gotta ask yourself who can go out there and deliver a match. Instead of a disqualification. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Exactamente. Exactly. Instead of our good 'ol friend. It would have been awesome to see Triple H win the title, but maybe the same thing that happened at No Mercy would have repeat itself. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know. What's the deal with that finisher? Anyways, 'Taker's streak lives on. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
That finisher scares me. I know, too bad the Patriots didn't have it that way. :( Well, can't wait 'til tomorrow. All the vandalism / edits that will need to be reverted. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
True, but you know after WM all the crap will start. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:48, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar design

What do you think of this barnstar design for WP:PW? iMatthew 2008 19:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Looks good, but I think it's a little too big. You'll have to ask others what they think. –LAX 19:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've brought it up at WT:PW. Also, can you semi-protect WrestleMania XXVI for 24 hours, because as we both know, it will receive an enormous amount of vandalism tonight. iMatthew 2008 19:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I, unfortunately, am not as experienced as I should be when it comes to protecting pages. So, I would ask another admin, probably Nikki311. –LAX 19:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

SummerSlam 2007 - Cena/Orton

I've done some of the linking issues. Anyway: "At The Great American Bash, John Cena defeated Bobby Lashley to retain the WWE Championship.[22][23] The next night on RAW, Executive Assistant Jonathan Coachman announced Randy Orton as the new number one contender to the WWE Championship.[24][25]" - Didn't Orton RKO Cena the night after the Bash, and the Coach came out and announced the #1 Contender? I think that needs to be rectified in the article. D.M.N. (talk) 20:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It says them here. And yes, you were sounding like a dick. (joke before you send a nasty message back!! :P) D.M.N. (talk) 20:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

My Edit

Hey man. I did it to warn people the stupidity level of the event. I am a wrestling fan, I love Wrestling, but this was a bad event. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.68.190.170 (talk) 22:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Did you see those edits at WM XXV?--3L VaK3r0 02:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

hey

hey, it's me. I heard about that sick vandal who ruined the page. P.S. did u see the Hall of Fame last night. It was cool.I'm On Base (talk) 02:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yay. Undertaker won. He Rules. 02:52, 31 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baseball16 (talkcontribs)

True. That finisher is like the new ending for every Undertaker match now. BRING BACK THE TOMBSTONE. I'm On Base (talk) 03:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

^^^Undertaker owned tonight. Anyway. On the Triple H article, in the history it says that you said, we agreed on to cap. brands? When was that? BTW, Triple H has been nominated for FA status; here. NimiTize 03:51, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can I move the entire WM XXIV article into a sandbox, and leave only the results there. It's getting to much vandalism, and I'm doing to work on it soon. iMatthew 2008 10:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I never said I owned the article... iMatthew 2008 23:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Maybe I said it wrong. I meant can I move the info to my sandbox temporarily while I work on it and expand it. I'm not asking to leave it there or something, just to transfer into to my sandbox. iMatthew 2008 23:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Naitch

I'm gonna miss naitch. will you? 67.189.185.73 (talk) 13:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Background

It reads well. One part though stands to mind. In the sentence with "Shane McMahon, who planned the angle after their last appearance on the June 4 edition of RAW, signed cast members Bam Margera, Chris Pontius, Johnny Knoxville, Preston Lacey, Ryan Dunn, Steve-O, and Wee-Man to be involved". Maybe re-wording it like "Shane McMahon, who planned (organized) the angle, after the cast made an appearance on the June 4 edition of RAW....." Overall, I understand it, but it would be best to get second opinions. Zenlax T C S 19:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, it does seem like a slap in the face, but I take criticism to correct my mistakes. :) As for the e-mail, yes I have received it and I have replied. Have you received that e-mail as well? Zenlax T C S 19:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Was this a decision the two of you concluded with? Zenlax T C S 19:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not to get into a full discussion, but if the decision was made, I have no choice but to abide by it. The other reason being is that my iPhone will not let me open another browser, as I am currently working on some tasks. Zenlax T C S 19:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Glad to hear. I just hope this does not affect me in the mere future. Zenlax T C S 19:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm glad to know that. I see that I've surrounded myself with a faithful group of editors. :) Zenlax T C S 19:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you say it that way, I believe I would be put in that same situation. Has anyone commentated? Zenlax T C S 19:52, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Understandable. Not to sound rude or a bit ever, but can we please leave the subject about the "e-mail" and focus our attention at Backlash (2004)? Zenlax T C S 20:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, if I seemed a bit tedious, but I think the subject should be discussed with the other members to see what they think. If they come to an agreement, I think it would be best to talk about the subject once more. As for Backlash, are you open to help improve the article? Zenlax T C S 20:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I wasn't sure, as I know that you have complete focus on SummerSlam. Zenlax T C S 20:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough. I think this may seem like an old question, but, I'll ask it anyway, would you like some help? Zenlax T C S 20:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: WrestleMania XXIV

I really don't particularly want to take sides here but:

Remember, the purpose of links is to direct the reader to a new spot at the point(s) where the reader is most likely to take a temporary detour due to needing more information.
- Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)

So I guess at the first instance of its mention. -- Oakster  Talk  20:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I replied.--3L VaK3r0 21:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well i replied to the reply you gave my reply ;)--3L VaK3r0 21:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
ok now check.--3L VaK3r0 21:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hmm, didn't get it.--3L VaK3r0 21:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Got it and replied.--3L VaK3r0 22:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yea and I replied.--3L VaK3r0 22:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
This email sucks..you have Yahoo messenger?--3L VaK3r0 22:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well do you have a yahoo email?3L VaK3r0 22:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well that way, we can use the online chatroom they have.--3L VaK3r0 22:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
It's the same thing, but you need a Y! email to use Yahoo Messenger, there are 2 versions of Y! messenger, the online and download one, just use the online one, and when you are done tell me your Y! name so I can find you.--3L VaK3r0 22:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I didn't get it yet.3L VaK3r0 23:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ok now log into your messenger..3L VaK3r0 23:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the late respond... I was pissed about somethin earlyer. NimiTize 23:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

no you have to go to the yahoo homepage and click on the messenger icon, and then you have to sign into the messenger.3L VaK3r0 23:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Your not a dick, am the dick. NimiTize 23:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well I sent you a message, look for me, kevin_salvadorian
that's how it's exactly spelt, with the underscroll.3L VaK3r0 23:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'll be the first one 2 support ;) NimiTize 23:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lol, don't worry when I retire, I would of accomplished:
  • A admin
  • 20,000 edits
  • At least got 5 articles to FA status
  • At least got 6 articles to GA status
  • 5 Articles created
  • Support in 500 XfD's
  • 3 years of service/2 years
  • And last but not least, have a history of respect. NimiTize 23:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Lol, I'll keep in mind that, Friends come, Friends go. NimiTize 23:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright, we got ours, Zenlax and Truco's POV. We just need Nici's opinion. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
What's going on? iMatthew 2008 00:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hold on, I'll download it right now. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I got it. What's your screename? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've tried to message you on yahoo messanger... iMatthew 2008 00:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

MFD

I was wondering if there is any way i can get it off of my main page. There is no history of anybody adding it to my page. Could you help me, cause i have no idea what to do S—PAC54 23:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why is NimiTize gone? iMatthew 2008 10:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

How Random.. iMatthew 2008 10:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
You know what, I actually never said that I see it you way, because I do not. I do not understand why this is happening...why all of you who I thought were my friends just turned on me, so thanks guys. I really need to get out of this place, and no, it's not just for five minutes. iMatthew 2008 10:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I am very sorry to hear that. Zenlax T C S 20:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I can't respond at the moment, as I am currently getting to enter into a meeting. I will, however, respond a little later. Is that fine by you? Zenlax T C S 20:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for understanding, but work is work. If you would have contacted me a little earlier I would have responded, but duty calls first. Zenlax T C S 20:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes, please. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

......

"Do you remember the story of Old Yeller? They loved that dog" -- Shawn Michaels. NimiTize 20:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

When the hell did Matt retire, and you? Your the problem?? I really DK. NimiTize 20:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright. BTW, if you have something like AIM or yahoo, we can do dat. NimiTize 20:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well whats your email? NimiTize 20:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Retire or Not?

Go here. NimiTize 21:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Idk, ill email you my im sooner or later. NimiTize 21:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Man you so nice, I always, ALWAYS, respected you and trusted you, always admired you on the Wiki. NimiTize 21:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 14 31 March 2008 About the Signpost

Wikimania 2009 to be held in Buenos Aires Sister Projects Interview: Wikisource 
WikiWorld: "Hammerspace" News and notes: 10M articles, $500k donation, milestones 
Dispatches: Featured content overview WikiProject Report: Australia 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Q

Whats your Yahoo! ? NimiTize 23:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

3 in one day. New record. iMatthew 2008 23:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ignore Matt's comments above!, disrespectful..but yea I will be back every here and then, but it's too much..Im sorry, please take care of the queries I left at WT:PW.--3L VaK3r0 00:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hey Truco said before he retired to get to know you well...I just wanted to say hi do you think the wp:pw club will ever b the same? CrymeTyme-94 00:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Of Course man.3L VaK3r0 00:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Backlash (2007)

Hi, I did a pre-GA review of this article today. I did some copyediting, but I didn't see anything that I felt needed to be brought up on the talk page. The article is easy to understand, and I don't forsee any real problems during a GA review. Good job with this article. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I also got a pre-GA review and copyediting of Judgment Day (2007) done today. I left a short list on the article's talk page of things that I think should be clarified. You're doing a great job with these articles. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I assumed that you had written them because you added them to my to-do list. Anyhow, I did a bunch of copyediting for stuff like verb tense, point of view ("brutally" and similar words were used fairly regularly throughout both), and ease of reading. Both articles are fairly short and don't go into a lot of detail, but they cover all of the important aspects. I'm pretty sure that I go into too much detail in the pay-per-view articles I write, so I have a hard time saying that other articles are too short. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply