Kole7

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bjak (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bjak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Kole7! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Hello Kole7. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kole7. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kole7|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. I'll revise the draft to ensure it meets Wikipedia's guidelines and doesn't come across as promotional. Let's focus on providing neutral, encyclopedic content supported by reliable, independent sources. I'll make the necessary adjustments to address the concerns raised. Kole7 (talk) 02:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. I'll revise the draft to ensure it meets Wikipedia's guidelines and doesn't come across as promotional. Let's focus on providing neutral, encyclopedic content supported by reliable, independent sources. I'll make the necessary adjustments to address the concerns raised. Kole7 (talk) 02:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. I'll revise the draft to ensure it meets Wikipedia's guidelines and doesn't come across as promotional. Let's focus on providing neutral, encyclopedic content supported by reliable, independent sources. I'll make the necessary adjustments to address the concerns raised. Kole7 (talk) 02:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:40, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. I'll revise the draft to ensure it meets Wikipedia's guidelines and doesn't come across as promotional. Let's focus on providing neutral, encyclopedic content supported by reliable, independent sources. I'll make the necessary adjustments to address the concerns raised. Kole7 (talk) 02:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bjak (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bjak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. I'll revise the draft to ensure it meets Wikipedia's guidelines and doesn't come across as promotional. Let's focus on providing neutral, encyclopedic content supported by reliable, independent sources. I'll make the necessary adjustments to address the concerns raised. Kole7 (talk) 02:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bjak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bjak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. gobonobo ^{+ c} 11:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. I'll revise the draft to ensure it meets Wikipedia's guidelines and doesn't come across as promotional. Let's focus on providing neutral, encyclopedic content supported by reliable, independent sources. I'll make the necessary adjustments to address the concerns raised. Kole7 (talk) 02:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bjak.my

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bjak.my, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 16:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. I'll revise the draft to ensure it meets Wikipedia's guidelines and doesn't come across as promotional. Let's focus on providing neutral, encyclopedic content supported by reliable, independent sources. I'll make the necessary adjustments to address the concerns raised. Kole7 (talk) 02:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Advert and COI warnings

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Kole7. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 17:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. I'll revise the draft to ensure it meets Wikipedia's guidelines and doesn't come across as promotional. Let's focus on providing neutral, encyclopedic content supported by reliable, independent sources. I'll make the necessary adjustments to address the concerns raised. Kole7 (talk) 02:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bjak Group (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bjak Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

• Significance in the Industry: If the company has made significant contributions or innovations in the digital finance or insurance sectors, this could demonstrate its importance and relevance for inclusion.
• Coverage in Reliable Sources: If the company has been extensively covered in reliable, independent sources such as news articles, academic journals, or books, this indicates that it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria.
• Regional Impact: If the company's operations have had a notable impact on the digital finance landscape in Southeast Asia or other regions where it operates, this could be a valid reason for inclusion.
• Historical or Cultural Importance: If the company has a unique history or cultural significance that makes it noteworthy, this could also justify its inclusion on Wikipedia.
• Independent Reviews or Awards: Recognition from reputable industry bodies, awards, or accolades may also demonstrate the company's importance and notability.

Kole7 (talk) 02:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bjak Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bjak Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

• Significance in the Industry: If the company has made significant contributions or innovations in the digital finance or insurance sectors, this could demonstrate its importance and relevance for inclusion.
• Coverage in Reliable Sources: If the company has been extensively covered in reliable, independent sources such as news articles, academic journals, or books, this indicates that it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria.
• Regional Impact: If the company's operations have had a notable impact on the digital finance landscape in Southeast Asia or other regions where it operates, this could be a valid reason for inclusion.
• Historical or Cultural Importance: If the company has a unique history or cultural significance that makes it noteworthy, this could also justify its inclusion on Wikipedia.
• Independent Reviews or Awards: Recognition from reputable industry bodies, awards, or accolades may also demonstrate the company's importance and notability.

Kole7 (talk) 02:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

I recommend not using text created by LLMs when contesting a nomination. Your own words have much more of a chance to be convincing. jellyfish ✉ 02:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

thanks Kole7 (talk) 02:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bjak Group (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bjak Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:37, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bjak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bjak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Manticore 04:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

thx Kole7 (talk) 04:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)