Peer review edit

Hi KingdomHearts. It's been a long time since I reviewed the Backstreet Boys article, and I don't remember anything about it. I checked the peer review just now, and I think "author date" was a typo and should just have been "author". As to the double bolding, I added a link to the relevant section of the Manual of Style that explains my reasoning. But, really, my review was just advice, and if double bolding is the discography custom, perhaps you should stick with it. On the matter of further review, I think at this point your best bet would be to make the article as good as you can and then resubmit it to WP:PR for a fresh review by someone else. I'm taking a break from intense reviewing; I've been doing too much of it lately. Best wishes. Finetooth (talk) 17:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to take part in a pilot study edit

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 20:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, KingdomHearts25. You have new messages at Novice7's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
 
Hello, KingdomHearts25. You have new messages at Novice7's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You're welcome. Novice7 (talk) 10:02, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

re:BSB discography edit

I'd like to help out but I already invest almost all of my time editing lot of other pages including List of best-selling music artists. I will; however, be keeping an eye on that page as usual. By the way, seems to me the reviewing editor has rejected the Backstreet Boys discography for the time being, he states at the bottom Not too bad, but needs a bit of work. Oppose for now. Please ping my talk page for a revisit.--Harout72 (talk) 20:21, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I will. And hey, good work overall on Backstreet Boys discography.--Harout72 (talk) 20:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Invite to WikiConference India 2011 edit

 

Hi KingdomHearts25,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

BSB Burger King For the Fans edit

I started a discussion here about it on the BSB discography talk page Talk:Backstreet Boys discography#For the Fans. Hope you can reply soon :)--Krystaleen (talk) 13:22, 19 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Opinion edit

Could you opine on this this matter. Regards AdabowtheSecond (talk) 18:31, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

April 2014 edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! hydrox (talk) 07:18, 28 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 15 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Indian Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Warner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

CWC edit

Hi. Australia have qualified. It's called maths. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:46, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Australia only needs to get into the top 4 to qualify. The bottom three cannot pass Australia. Alan Davidson (talk) 07:50, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
And Australia will still qualify, regardless of what other teams do. It's called maths. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, KingdomHearts25. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, KingdomHearts25. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Revengers Tragedy (song) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revengers Tragedy (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revengers Tragedy (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:43, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notice of noticeboard discussion edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of User:KingdomHearts25/sandbox edit

 

The page User:KingdomHearts25/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 10:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of User:KingdomHearts25 edit

 

The page User:KingdomHearts25 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 10:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

WP:NOTWEBHOST edit

Wikipedia is not a webhost. Please stop posting your personal projects here. Continuing to do so can result in a loss of your editing privileges.

If you like I can e-mail you the content I have deleted but you need to store it somewhere other than Wikipedia.HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 10:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

I deeply apologise, as profusely as I can, for misusing my page. I was not aware that it constituted such a serious offence. Can I please have my page, along with the editing history back? I will immediately delete the content and never repost any such thing on my web page again. One more violation and you can definitely permanently delete my page. Please give me a second chance KingdomHearts25 (talk) 10:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
No problem. As long as it does not continue then there is no problem at all. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 11:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much :) KingdomHearts25 (talk) 11:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply