Kikoman1978

Your draft article, Draft:Václav Krahulík

Hello, Kikoman1978. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Václav Krahulík".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Václav Krahulík moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Václav Krahulík, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello Kikoman1978 -- Thanks for contributing this article. The subject may meet the encyclopedia's threshold for inclusion but more sources are needed to show that this is the case. At least two and preferably three are required. Reviews/discussion of his concerts, recordings, books or compositions in newspapers, magazines or books would be ideal. For a living person, every fact in the article must be sourced inline to reliable sources. Does all the information you have given appear in the Czech dictionary you link? If so, then you need to indicate this; I have added a reference name for you so you just need to add the code <ref name=Cesky_hudebni /> after every sentence or paragraph that is covered. Unfortunately I speak no Czech so cannot verify this for you.

Also, if this is a translation of the Czech wikipedia article [1] then this needs to be indicated. You can do this in an edit summary or by making a talk page for the draft.

If you need help then the Teahouse is a friendly forum for new editors. Good luck! Espresso Addict (talk) 00:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the advice! I have edited the text adding more sources. 1978Kikoman (talk) 22:46, 20 January 2021 (GMT+9)

Hello again -- Thanks for that! I've asked an expert from the classical music project who speaks Czech to take a look, and if they aren't available to help then I have some other suggested avenues to get a review from someone with some language competence. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 14:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much! 1978Kikoman (talk) 15:43, 21 January 2021 (GMT+9)