This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Kidkel69 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was COMPLETELY AWARE OF THE NON-ADVERTISING RULES- have studied how bands such as Led Zeppelin, RollingStones, etc. and understand wiki format for band histories , I have 1000 + networks to advertise and promote on I do not wish or use wiki for either mentioned only to account and document. I am a credible journalist for Clarity group and understand nothing in a wiki can be promotional. If you decide to keep me blocked I beg of you please can someone help get the Hydrogyn wiki published correctly and in place and then inform me at rockingfunmusic1969@gmail.com This is a historical account of a band from Ashlyn Kentucky who do not desire promotion, their only desire is for historical documentation for the band has a 12 year history and many different incarnations. Please help me please, you can use any info on my content -or simply google Hydrogyn Kentucky for your sources -how can I assure this historical account (non promotional _ account of Hydrogyn can be documented, because of my block and lack of format experience, I am requesting assistance Thank You, Kellie Levans Kellie Levans 15:12, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Accept reason:

After discussion with the blocking admin, I'm going to go ahead and unblock you now. I strongly encourage you to check out the Paid Editor Help Board which exists to help out people in your situation. Bovlb (talk) 18:56, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank You Bovlb , I found all of the workings here very educational. I hope to learn more here and to become a important contributor on music history.

Hello, Kellie. Welcome to Wikipedia. I'm sorry that you've been having a rocky time of it here. I'm going to place your unblock request on hold for a little bit, to slow down this cycle of requests and rejections. I'm going to discuss the matter with the blocking administrator. In the meantime, there are a few things you could do here that might help yourself. First of all, I'm going to explain, as I see it, what you've been doing here that could be viewed as disruptive:

  1. You replaced your user page (since deleted) with what appears to be simply an advert for a commercial service. An earlier version from 2009 gave a short autobiography. Wikipedia editors have great latitude in what they put on their user pages, and you were quite entitled to remove that autobiography. It was the addition of advertising that became the problem at that page.
  2. You extended the article on Hydrogyn with a lot of content that was highly promotional in tone. Wikipedia is an encyclopædia, and we strive to present a neutral point of view. Your version of the article read like it had been written by someone paid to promote the band. It is not forbidden for people with a conflict of interest to edit Wikipedia, but we discourage it because we have seen that it is very hard for people employed to promote and market to do a good job editing the same topic on Wikipedia.
  3. Your content was poorly formatted and lacked references.

My recommendation for you at this point is that you use a section on this page to draft some changes you might make to Wikipedia if unblocked. Choose Hydrogyn if you must, but consider choosing to improve the content on one of your competitor's bands first (as I'm assuming the music scene is your area of expertise). Cheers, Bovlb (talk) 15:57, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

One more point: You might want to read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations, Wikipedia:WikiProject Cooperation, and Wikipedia:For publicists publicizing a client's work, and indicate how you would change your approach in the light of their advice. Bovlb (talk) 16:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kidkel69 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi thank you for your email today -please unblock my ip and user name for I have now read and understand all of the Wikipedia guidelines. I am aware of the no advertising or promotions rule. The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I was blocked for. I will not cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions with value. thank You Kellie Levans-user kidkel69 Thank You =Your reason here Kellie Levans 01:52, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have explicitly stated that your purpose here is to promote bands. That is not what Wikipedia is for; I believe there are many other media where such promotion is welcome. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

I need full freedom all unblocked so I can learn - I am requesting full user account and ip free so I can learn , how can I learn with no oppurtunity-I am not here to promote bands-I have 1069 plus sites to do that I am here to record music history.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Kidkel69 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
174.102.215.251 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Kidkel69". The reason given for Kidkel69's block is: "Advertising".


Decline reason: Procedural decline; this is a direct block, not an autoblock. Yunshui  13:00, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kidkel69 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi thank you for your email today -please unblock my ip and user name for I have now read and understand all of the Wikipedia guidelines. I am aware of the no advertising or promotions rule. The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I was blocked for. I will not cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions with value. thank You Kellie Levans-user kidkel69 Thank You Kellie Levans 01:55, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

see answer to later unblock request. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kidkel69 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I need to learn and need help never meant to violate rules Kellie Levans 12:40 am, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

It is very clear that you need to learn how Wikipedia is supposed to be used. However, it is equally apparent that you have not yet learned this. Until we can be quite certain that you understand the reason for which you were blocked, and why your edits were inappropriate, this account will not be unblocked. You don't get to disrupt Wikipedia whilst you learn "on the job", so to speak - come back when you've actually read and understood this website's content policies. Yunshui  13:00, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Now , being a writer I do research daily and new on wiki I see several of the bands I review -I see RollingStones, Led Zeppelin, the Who, so many I can't count -I am here to stand up for indie artists and put there bands in the history of rock and roll, country, alternative and the like. Please help -if I add article links does that help?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kidkel69 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

FROM KIDKEL69 -All of this is because I wanted a speedy deletion of my RollingStone Magazine INFO-I WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MAGAZINE ANYMORE-I COULD NOT FIND A DELETE-so I quickly erased and posted a link not knowing the rule being new here -it is imperative I am unblocked I am in charge of making wiki's for national music bands-I am new -the new wikis are for history of the bands. I am a music journalist-Kellie Levans - please delete my content that was published prior to Sept 23/24- Hydrogen -needs to stay in place -my other are only mistakes of not being able to remove RollingStone info -Please unblock me please jimfbleak

Decline reason:

Since you've basically admitted that you're here to promote bands, no, you're not getting unblocked. Your sole contribution prior to those days has been deleted, however. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Kidkel69, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Kidkel69, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MrScorch6200 (talk) 23:33, 23 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

What I need is to be unblocked and taught how to do this right-I am a writer for publications-so this is all by mistake and not by lack of virtue to the wiki community -I want Hydrogyn to be my first work and I want the opportunity for help you can see all the info in my revisions I want Hydrogyns page to look like all the other bands pages here -not for promotions but for historical purposes on an indillectuals life's work. Anyone willing to help me format Hydrogen with photo correctly? While Jimfbleak decides my fate as a wiki writer?

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Kidkel69

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Kidkel69, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. MrScorch6200 (talk) 23:33, 23 September 2013 (UTC)Reply


FROM  KIDKEL69 -All of this is because I wanted a speedy deletion of my RollingStone Magazine INFO-I WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MAGAZINE ANYMORE-I COULD NOT FIND A DELETE-so I quickly erased and posted a link not knowing the rule being new here -it is imperative I am unblocked I am in charge of making wiki's for national music bands-I am new -the new wikis are for history of the bands. I am a music journalist-Kellie Levans -

please delete my content that was published prior to Sept 23/24- Hydrogen -needs to stay in place -my other are only mistakes of not being able to remove RollingStone info -Please unblock me please jimfbleak

Your edits at Hydrogyn

edit

Please be aware that we do not allow that kind of content in articles. Your edits were promotional and of inappropriate tone for an encyclopedia, which presents facts that serve to document the subject's notability. Further, please go through this so you get a feel for how articles should be structured and formatted. All of your text is still in the article's history, you can get what you need from there, and make sure you add sources for everything you are writing. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:37, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Hydrogyn Real Rock.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Hydrogyn Real Rock.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Blurred Lines 01:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:43, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Kidkel69! Read this please

edit

Hello Kidkel69. It seems you've run afoul of our somewhat difficult conflict-of-interest rules. Not sure if you're even still editing, but in case you are:

Here's good practice: follow the (not-exactly-written-down) rule called "Bright Line", which says that if you're here for promotional purposes, never write material directly into an article. Instead, put your proposed changes to the article on the talk page, and ask people something like "Is this OK? Discussion welcome". Your proposed changes can be a complete rewrite of the article, changes or additions to several paragraphs, changing one word, or whatever. The material may be rejected, modified by other editors, or accepted as is. If it's not rejected, another editor will come along eventually and paste the changes into the article. (Writing the material into the article yourself is crossing the "bright line", hence the rule name.)

Further questions and help, see WP:WikiProject Cooperation.b (FWIW none of this constitutes approval of promotional editing or of Bright Line on my part. I merely describe.) Herostratus (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply


TALK IMPORTANT -I recently was re-instated after a confusing issue about Band bios/and advertising-my inexperence at writing WIKI makes me a afraid to begin again -in fear of losing my account-I aM asking for anyone to help me write a wiki for the band Hydrogyn (in place) here is all the info https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hydrogyn&action=history If some one helps me I will learn from the wiki and know how to write it-thank you -get back to me rockingfunmusic1969@gmail.com

Editing

edit

Hi. I'm glad you were unblocked, but you need to learn how to edit articles before you go any further. In your last edits to Hydrogyn, you added an inline link which should have been a reference, and you removed a heading. The help page includes both a simple and comprehensive editing guide, and I highly recommend using your sandbox as well to experiment. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:30, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

thank you freerangefrog I tried adding to reference first I am in the study guides , very difficult — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.52.192.218 (talk) 20:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Right, so in order to be effective you need to learn, like we all did at some point. Starting from the basic things, like always editing while logged in and signing your comments, which you didn't do just now. Seriously, use your sandbox. It's here. I copied the contents of the article to it. That's something you can edit in peace without anyone interfering, and once you feel more comfortable then you can edit the live article like a champ. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
And I just nominated Hydrogyn Billboard Chart for deletion. Please don't create any more articles, read our help guides and use only your sandbox. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:05, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

February 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hydrogyn may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[File:Westlake1nonpromodescritiveicon.jpg|thumb|left|Hydrogyn is [[Julie Westlake]] vocals [[Jeff

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:30, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply