Kbhtech

September 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kevin Harris have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kevin Harris was changed by Kbhtech (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.900374 on 2021-09-15T01:27:47+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with Kevin Harris. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. MB 02:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kbhtech (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Kbhtech and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Kbhtech, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:50, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Kbhtech! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:50, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Kbhtech

A tag has been placed on User:Kbhtech requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 03:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

"...For the lack of good judgement" (apriori, a response too: USER:GPL93)

This account does not exist to promote myself.

I was exploring the use of Wikipedia as a floor plan for a large project.

This was an attempt to archive/index works with a cover page for it. My intended use was not miscellaneous. I just seen a lot of light of the platforms potential for productivity.

The downside was that on something as simple as a user page it demands a lot of content, really fast, and that is nothing that I am capable of producing with my skills at the moment. I was bewildered.

The desire was to have an intro, link it up with Git. Share database procedures, layouts, and processes. Then roll out of dev into beta.

I don't have to use Wikipedia to Archive/Index. Jot it down as a limitation.

I would have talked more on your page to see how you could help me in this moment, apparently, that is also a limitation on a blocked account.

September 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Kinu ^t/_c 03:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kbhtech (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Wikipedia;

It was not my intention to hijack a page. I am still working on understanding the procedural flow of this platform for publishers. This does require some time and effort. Needless too say, I am glad to be working on these skills with the community and would appreciate a review on both the block and the flag for speedy deletion.

I did not even know that I was in the wrong until the bot had started utilizing strong language and after that point, it was too late.

Can someone provide some oversight? It would be greatly appreciated... I was trying to have a brief about but then house a project here.

Kbhtech (talk) 05:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You went from requesting unblock to saying you are no longer interested quickly, but since you are leaving, there is no reason to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 08:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lets get down to the bottom of this

I need to know how I can breadcrumb publications while developing solutions and then publicize only after those resources have been released. Ne-extroverted intuitive. I'm kinda a wiki-tard in this area of life. Ya'll ought to be appreciative that I am looking to CRUD. Seeking this power for DEVOPS. I am asking you to stir me the right direction.

Enjoy :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk8pXudx5n4

The "bottom of this" is that this is an encyclopedia and we are not interested in your self-promotion. Attempting to obfuscate your goals behind streams of technical jargon doesn't change that fact. --Kinu ^t/_c 13:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Take Care

I am out of this place. I think that I have rivalled you up enough considering the fact that VPN's, duplicate e-mails, and all exist to help us discover solutions to bigger better things which means that talk-etiquette just isn't real. Not out to put the Si-pressure (Bipolar II & ADHD; commonly seen in intellectually gifted adults) on non-responsive Wikipedia people that truthfully don't "get it." and the last thing I want to offend is a #sugarcookie. You would be a distraction. It's not necessary. Audios.

"Acts of Service _is_ Key."

Since most, if not all, of your comments here are borderline nonsense and show that you are not here to build an encyclopedia, I'm revoking your talk page access to prevent any further wasting of time on everyone's part. --Kinu ^t/_c 15:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.