May 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm QuantumRealm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sundar C. have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. QuantumRealm (meowpawtrack) 14:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Gnana Mahabharatam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jupitus Smart 16:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Sundar C.. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 14:35, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sundar C., you may be blocked from editing.
You were clearly told not to add links to user pages in actual articles, above, but did so again- Arjayay (talk) 09:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Gnana Mahabharatam

edit

The article you created was completely unsourced and have moved into draft space until you add a decent degree of citations. After that you can submit the article for review. Govvy (talk) 13:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gnana Mahabharatam (May 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Kallu Kumhar! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gnana Mahabharatam (May 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Gnana Mahabharatam

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Gnana Mahabharatam, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jupitus Smart 16:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Kallu Kumhar,
This article should not be in the main space of the encyclopedia because it is totally unsourced and unverified. If you move it from draft space or recreate it in main space, it will be deleted again. Please work on providing references to the draft version. Liz Read! Talk! 17:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Gnana Mahabharatam

edit
 

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Gnana Mahabharatam. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jupitus Smart 17:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2021

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 17:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply