Kaffyne

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Welcome! My name is Alpha Quadrant, and I'm an Online Ambassador. We are a group of experienced Wikipedians who offer assistance, support, and mentorship for newcomers. You don't need to read anything; you can just jump right in and try to improve Wikipedia. If you need help, you can talk with us right now, or you can leave me a message on my user talk page. Have fun! Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 01:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Editing cheatsheet Forgot how that code worked?	Summary of policies and guidelines A quick reference for Wikipedia's "rules"
Find the page for your course Forgot the link to your course's page?	Starting an article Guide to starting your first article
Chat with us: Ask a question on the classroom IRC channel or on the regular help chat . Just enter your Wikipedia user name, fill in the words you see in the image, and click connect.

DYK nomination of United States v. Cotterman

Hello! Your submission of United States v. Cotterman at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LauraHale (talk) 00:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for United States v. Cotterman

The DYK project (nominate) 01:46, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Kaffyne, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 21:16, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Education Program Student Survey

Hi! Please take a few minutes to fill out this survey about the Wikipedia Education Program. This is our opportunity to improve the program and resources we provide students, so your feedback and input is integral to our future success. Thank you so much! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 22:01, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Kaffyne! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 05:12, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Some comments from your 1st reviewer

Hello Kaffyne! I just reviewed your article on "College Network, Inc. v. Moore Educational Publishers, Inc."It is really a well-written one! I only corrected some minor typos and you should be able to track them in the edit history.

On the other hand, I have a few comments regarding the article itself. They are mostly my thoughts on the article, so please feel free to ignore them :)

1) I think there is too much detail on the background and case analysis part. You seemed to tell a lot of stories behind this case. As an example, you described how the "business statement" by telling some of the details in the sales training. I think you can remove a lot of them while still be able to make the point.

2) Is there any impact out of this case, or does it affect subsequent decisions on other cases? If you could find some of them, may be it worth putting them in the end. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dc.to.daylight (talk • contribs) 05:57, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Some comments from the 1st Reviewer of the article you signed up to 2nd Review

Hi Kaffyne! I was the 1st Reviewer on the article "Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. WTV Systems, Inc." I got the following comment from a DYK reviewer about the nomination:

"Symbol possible vote.svg Good article length, but there may be some POV issues in the lead. A lot of quotes, maybe too many. Some text is taken from the court's decision verbatim without quotation marks, so there may be a plagiarism issue. The hook is short but maybe a bit misleading. ypnypn (talk) 15:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qqz (talk • contribs)

DYK nomination of Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Redd Horne, Inc.

Hello! Your submission of Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Redd Horne, Inc. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:49, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for College Network, Inc. v. Moore Educational Publishers, Inc.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 20 November 2012 (UTC)