Jutta.Becker-Ritterspach

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jutta.Becker-Ritterspach. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Socio-Economic Review, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 12:48, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello Dan,

Thank you for this information. The information I added to the Socio-Economic Review Wikipedia website are common knowledge. Should other Wikipedia user confirm may changes in order to prove that they are correct?

Kind regards,

Jutta Jutta.Becker-Ritterspach (talk) 12:55, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

Hello Jutta.Becker-Ritterspach. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Socio-Economic Review, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jutta.Becker-Ritterspach. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jutta.Becker-Ritterspach|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Storchy (talk) 14:03, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Dear Storchy,

Thank you for your message. I am very sorry if you got the impression, that I got/get paid for the edits. I don't receive any compensation for these edits. I just tried to update the already existing knowledge on Socio-Economic Review, delete bots etc. The knowledge on Socio-Economic Review is commonly known knowledge.

Moreover, while editing, I discovered that a lot of knowledge, e.g. on Egyptian universities (e.g. GUC, GIU) is not known in the Wikipedia "world". As we lived 3 1/2 year there, I acquired a lot of knowledge about this at the same time fascinating and challenging country, which might be interesting for a huge readership. Therefore, I have plans are to create knowledge on Wikipedia.

I hope you understand my wish to improve Wikipedia and its contributions.

Kind regards,

Jutta Jutta.Becker-Ritterspach (talk) 14:18, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Florian Becker-Ritterspach moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Florian Becker-Ritterspach, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Storchy (talk) 14:03, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Florian Becker-Ritterspach

Hello, Jutta.Becker-Ritterspach. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Florian Becker-Ritterspach, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Florian Becker-Ritterspach

Hello, Jutta.Becker-Ritterspach. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Florian Becker-Ritterspach".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:09, 6 December 2023 (UTC)