Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit

 
Hi Goleadoras! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:42, Monday, September 9, 2019 (UTC)

Help me! edit

Please help me with a doubt. This is my first time creating content/making a Wikipedia page and I don't know where can i find the specific link to it so that I can share it. I don't know when or if there is anything else I need to do in order for people to be able to find my page on their google search.

Goleadoras (talk) 23:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Goleadoras.

Hi Goleadoras, which topic would you like to write about? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:58, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
(edit conflict) Your page, unfortunately, has been deleted as it was promotional in nature. In addition, you edited your user page, which is not article space, but a place to introduce yourself to the Wikipedia community in the context of your Wikipedia editing or use. I suspect that you may have confused creating an article with creating an account, as your username is that of your organization. You will need to change your username immediately; you may make a request to do so at Special:GlobalRenameRequest or WP:CHUS. Please do this as soon as possible.
Regarding your draft, you seem to have a common misconception about what Wikipedia is. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a place to merely tell about something. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is interested in what independent reliable sources with significant coverage state about article subjects, and has no interest in what the subject might want to say about itself. Article subjects only merit articles if they meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability; in this case, the more specific definition of a notable organization- as shown with independent sources. Such sources do not include the organization's website, press releases, staff interviews, routine announcements, or other primary sources.
In addition, you have what we call a conflict of interest in writing about your organization, and may also need to comply with the paid editing policy(even if you are not paid in money). The latter is a Terms of Use requirement. As you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid directly editing about your organization. There are indirect ways to do so, but only if you are interested in being a general Wikipedia contributor and not just represent your organization. 331dot (talk) 23:59, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Goleadoras (October 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. SITH (talk) 13:33, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, JuntasCambiamos! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SITH (talk) 13:33, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Declare any connection edit

 

Hello JuntasCambiamos. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to User:JuntasCambiamos/sandbox/Goleadoras, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JuntasCambiamos. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=JuntasCambiamos|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:54, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi JuntasCambiamos! You created a thread called Draft article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 October 2019 (UTC)Reply