Your submission at Articles for creation: Joram Piatigorsky (July 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 16:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Joram Piatigorsky, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 16:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joram Piatigorsky has been accepted

edit
 
Joram Piatigorsky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:15, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
I've heavily trimmed your submission and accepted it. Please refrain from editing the article yourself if you're unfamiliar with our policies and guidelines, or if you're associated with the subject in any way. It is my duty to advise you that your username possibly violates our username policy as well. Thank you for your contribution. Best, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:17, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply