Jjjakegittes

Jjjakegittes, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Jjjakegittes! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Stop adding unnecessary links to film articles, as you did at Sneakers (1992 film). And don't play dumb, or act innocent, because I know that you are Jkta97 editing under another name, and you have already been warned multiple times about this exact same crap. So, knock if off! ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 02:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Warning regarding your recent edits to Deliverance

I firmly believe that your recent edit to this article, restoring the absurdly long plot summary, was done out of spite and in knowing violation of WP:FILMPLOT. Your edits, in general, are unhelpful, but this crosses the line into vandalism. I suggest you stop. You have been here long enough to know what the rules are, so I suggest you start obeying them. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 15:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Dear Mr. TheOldJacobite, On the Deliverance, I just restored a summary that was written by someone else. You have had a problem with me ever since I have been around. I do not know who this jkta97 person is, but I am not he. My identity is J. J. "Jake" Gittes. My edits are not bad, and I am not a vandal. You have hurt my feelings, and I do not appreciate that. All you do is complain. I am sorry if I sound mean, but I have had a lot of stress in my life right now, and I do not want this to be an added burden. Please understand. Happy holidays! Sincerely, J. J. "Jake" Gittes

December 2012

Hello, I'm Gareth Griffith-Jones. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Apollonia Vitelli-Corleone because it didn't appear constructive. Her appearance is only in flashbacks. I hope you understand that your revision is not required. Thanks –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard| 06:21, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Désirée (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameron Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

... I wish you would complete the Edit summary box! ...

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
I noticed your editing—such as today, the Lisa Minelli article—never has the Edit summary box completed.
Please provide one before saving your changes to an article in future, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard| 11:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Fargo (film) does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! You need to start using edit summaries immediately and with all of your edits. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 03:37, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Recurring warnings that fall on deaf ears will result in blocks. Also, your edits to The Departed, aside from lacking edit summaries, reduce the quality of the writing as they do not comply with the Wikipedia standard. I suggest you start taking other editors seriously. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 21:16, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Considering your continuous bad edits that are way past good faith, I had no choice but report you to WP:AIV. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 21:38, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making disruptive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dog Day Afternoon. Reverted to revision 542963885 by Legobot: It was more accurate before ... needless meddlng ... please stop!  –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard| 11:39, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

I undid one of your recent contributions to Saturday Night Fever
Not required ... everybody knows that Tony is the diminutive of Anthony ...  –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard| 11:47, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

... and your latest edit summary there endorses my comment immediately above here: . (Frank refers to Tony as Anthony. Tony could be a nickname for either Antonio or Tony, so the distinction should be made.)
Nevertheless, at least you have started to complete the edit summary box. Thank you –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard| 12:19, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of J. J. "Jake" Gittes

The article J. J. "Jake" Gittes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A short biographical article about a fictional character, providing no context and no information not already provided by the articles about the films in which the character appeared; no indication whatsoever of any significance outside of said films.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 17:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)