Jiajiajiajia123

March 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Charlie Hebdo issue No. 1178— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Je suis Charlie with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:57, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Je suis Charlie has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not remove information just because you happen to personally disagree with it. Do not also leave lying edit-summaries. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Jiajiajiajia123, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jiajiajiajia123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not censored

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Je suis Charlie. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Stop imposing your opinions

Stop inflicting your opinions on the Je Suis Charlie page. Your changes will be reverted immediately anyway. If you persist, you will be suspended from editing. We try to be constructive, not destructive like you are being. Alaney2k (talk) 20:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Je Suis Charlie. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Charlie Hebdo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Charlie Hebdo was changed by Jiajiajiajia123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852707 on 2016-09-10T07:16:30+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Je suis Charlie, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jarkeld (talk) 07:21, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Je suis Charlie. _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Zyc1174 (talk) 10:16, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 10:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Je suis Charlie, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Murph9000 (talk) 11:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 11:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)