User talk:Jgera5/2009 Archive

This archive includes edits to User talk:Jgera5 from 2009. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the user's regular talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Fair use rationale for File:PITUNI-NOALT.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:PITUNI-NOALT.PNG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:AFCN-PIT-19681996.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AFCN-PIT-19681996.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 00:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:AFCN-PIT-whitepants.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AFCN-PIT-whitepants.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Logos and uniforms of the Pittsburgh Steelers

Hi. I've nominated Logos and uniforms of the Pittsburgh Steelers, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. You don't need to do anything further, and I'll monitor to see if there are any questions. The article you created is a great article, and I had created an article for the Steelmark logo that ties into it. Keep up the great work! Alansohn (talk) 02:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Both articles, yours and mine, are included in the same nomination. Thanks for the offer. Alansohn (talk) 12:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Logos and uniforms of the Pittsburgh Steelers

On January 14, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Logos and uniforms of the Pittsburgh Steelers, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 10:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:PNClogo.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:PNClogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading.STBotI (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Your uploads

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:PNClogo.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:PNClogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading.STBotI (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Your uploads

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:WKBN-TV 2009.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:WKBN-TV 2009.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright violation in File:AbandonedTurnpikeMap.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on File:AbandonedTurnpikeMap.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because File:AbandonedTurnpikeMap.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting File:AbandonedTurnpikeMap.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

2008 Detroit Lions season

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 2008 Detroit Lions season. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.TomCat4680 (talk) 04:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

DuMont

Hi Jgera,

Thanks so much for your recent contributions to DuMont Television Network. I'm pretty excited that someone else is adding sourced info to the article. Is it possible to find some different sources for the material you added? The current source that you provided is a blog, which normally isn't considered a reliable source. I'm pretty sure a better source for the material can be found. (You can respond here, on my talk page, or on the article's talk page, whichever is easiest for you). Again, thanks for your additions. Firsfron of Ronchester 03:00, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Using IMDB as a source

Please see [1] and [2]. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:05, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Misuse of edit summary

Under what definition do you call this edit vandalism? Use of deceptive edit summaries is not something that wins friends, and I'm having a lot of trouble understanding this one of yours. Could you explain so that I can understand? Unschool 08:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of CBS Mandate

An article that you have been involved in editing, CBS Mandate, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBS Mandate (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Dude, in all my years at Wikipedia, I have never seen the creator of an article agree with an AFD nomination. And I have been involved in hundreds and hundreds of these. You certainly deserve a barnstar for your refreshingly objective view of your own work (for the record, when I look at my first work at Wikipedia, I cringe as well...)--Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:12, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Integrity
		For having the objective viewpoint to !vote delete in an AFD for an article you yourself created, I hearby award you this Barnstar of Integrity. Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:12, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:BeaverConfluence.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BeaverConfluence.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Facebook Userbox

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tkgd2007/Userboxes/Facebook_Username _{TKGD2007|TALK} 03:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Former Mister Donut.jpg

File:Former Mister Donut.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Former Mister Donut, New Castle, PA.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Former Mister Donut, New Castle, PA.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

My bad

Thank you for your edits to Madden NFL 10, and sorry about reverting them. Bwrs (talk) 06:06, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Jgera5. You have new messages at Bwrs's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File copyright problem with File:WesternReservePBS.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:WesternReservePBS.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 08:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:TESTPATTERN WFMJ.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TESTPATTERN WFMJ.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:19, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Done!

PNC logo has been updated.

Thanks, Weatherman1126 (talk) 00:31, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Virtual Wallet

A tag has been placed on Virtual Wallet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of National City acquisition by PNC

Hello! Your submission of National City acquisition by PNC at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Allen3 ^talk 13:38, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for National City acquisition by PNC

On October 29, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article National City acquisition by PNC, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 04:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Clearview Federal Credit Union

A tag has been placed on Clearview Federal Credit Union requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 16:22, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clearview Federal Credit Union

The article Clearview Federal Credit Union has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not clear how this orphaned article meets notability guidelines, lacks any references to 3rd party sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Studebaker

Hi. Sorry I reverted your well-meaning edit about Andy Studebaker in the Studebaker article. The relevance of Studebaker-Worthington is very low, so its heirs can add nothing to the article, even if they have the 'Studebaker' name. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 02:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bengals–Steelers rivalry

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Bengals–Steelers rivalry. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bengals–Steelers rivalry. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Nice work!

Hello. I like your addition of the 2006 Steubenville photo to the Sky Financial Group article. Kudos to you, sir, for your good work! — Kralizec! (talk) 00:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FoxYoungstown.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FoxYoungstown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 05:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Yscameo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yscameo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)