Welcome!

edit

Hello, Jerzy Pudnik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mark Rattenbury, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — MusikAnimal talk 01:03, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Rattenbury

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark Rattenbury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — MusikAnimal talk 01:03, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mark (Duct-Tape)

edit
 

The article Mark (Duct-Tape) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject and mentioned short film do not appear to meet the notability guideline

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MusikAnimal talk 01:17, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Rattenbury

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark Rattenbury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. GB fan 01:55, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Duct-Tape (short) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duct-Tape (short) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duct-Tape (short) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dusti*poke* 02:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Infobox stats

edit

Hi, I've seen your recent amendment to the stats displayed in the infobox at Luciano Becchio, and wanted to let you know these account for league stats only; other competitions are excluded. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 15:02, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

August 2013

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Fernando Torres, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:09, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jason Crowe. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:27, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Peter Flynn

edit

Hello Jerzy Pudnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dr. Peter Flynn for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. static shakedown 19:12, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mr. Littlejeans

edit

Hello Jerzy Pudnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mr. Littlejeans for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sourov0000 (talk) 20:17, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Magnus Buchan

edit

Hello Jerzy Pudnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Magnus Buchan for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sourov0000 (talk) 20:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mrs. Calloway

edit

Hello Jerzy Pudnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mrs. Calloway for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sourov0000 (talk) 20:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Margaret Yang

edit

Hello Jerzy Pudnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Margaret Yang for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sourov0000 (talk) 20:20, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Dirk Calloway

edit

Hello Jerzy Pudnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dirk Calloway for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sourov0000 (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Nelson Guggenheim

edit

Hello Jerzy Pudnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dr. Nelson Guggenheim for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sourov0000 (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bert Fischer

edit

Hello Jerzy Pudnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bert Fischer for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sourov0000 (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Rosemary Cross

edit

Hello Jerzy Pudnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rosemary Cross for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sourov0000 (talk) 20:22, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Herman Blume

edit

Hello Jerzy Pudnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Herman Blume for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sourov0000 (talk) 20:24, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Max Fischer (Rushmore)

edit

Hello Jerzy Pudnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Max Fischer (Rushmore) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sourov0000 (talk) 20:24, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Nelson Guggenheim

edit

Hello Jerzy Pudnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dr. Nelson Guggenheim for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sourov0000 (talk) 20:28, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Dirk Calloway

edit

Hello Jerzy Pudnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dirk Calloway for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sourov0000 (talk) 20:28, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply