I notice that you've started to create a batch of interlocked userpages about your imaginary creations: musicians who don't exist who performed songs that don't exist on albums that don't exist.

Stop that at once. Wikipedia is not a free webhost for your fiction. The pages have been deleted; if you want the content back, it can be e-mailed to you. DS (talk) 15:11, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Answer edit

"As you may see, I did not make my "Creations" public. you have to go under my name to get it pretty much and it stated that this may not be real stuff at the top of the page as per wikipedia's notions. I made this because I have a passion for making fan stuff and if you will look under User:Honey Bee Real/Sierra Palmer, you will see that I got the idea from this person, the ENTIRE this is fanfiction and is stated as "could be not real" from the top of the page. I guess I would like my stuff emailed back to me ASAP. THIS IS A FREE SITE AND CLEARLY STATES THAT IT "MAY NOT BE REAL" BUT IT DOES NOT GIVE YOU PERMISSION TO DELETE IT."

I usually give people time to save the pages to their own computers before deleting, but they're usually gone by the time I leave the warning and they never edit again anyway, so this time I figured why not just delete. I'll have them e-mailed to you.

Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, in particular the part about how Wikipedia is not a free webhost. Also read Wikipedia:User pages, which explains what you can and cannot do with your userpages. Fanfiction is not permitted. That's not what we're here for, that's not why people donate money to keep Wikipedia running. I had no idea that Honey Bee Real's subpages existed; they're being deleted too.

I definitely do have permission to delete the pages. I can delete any page as long as I can justify my actions to other administrators.

Any more questions? DS (talk) 18:34, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rebecca Black edit

Regarding this edit, please do not add unsourced negative information to biographies. It is a violation of our WP:BLP policy and we tend not to be tolerant of such behavior. In addition, please do not falsify dates, as you did in the same edit. Both of these behaviors are considered vandalism. Cheers. lifebaka++ 18:21, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

April 2011 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rik Mayall with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:27, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Rebecca Black. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:53, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Note edit

You'll have noticed that your sandbox has been deleted again. This is because you were misusing it.

Again.

We had this discussion in December 2010, J. It still applies. If you really like using the Wikipedia format, you can download a free copy of the MediaWiki software and run it on your own machine. But you can't use Wikipedia space for your fiction. DS (talk) 00:55, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Ao7z-4GCQAEDaxr.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Ao7z-4GCQAEDaxr.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:That Wasn't Me.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:That Wasn't Me.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Ao7z-4GCQAEDaxr.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Ao7z-4GCQAEDaxr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Bear Creek.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Bear Creek.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 1 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Bear Creek.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Bear Creek.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply