JayRhyan

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dylan Bounce (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dylan Bounce and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dylan Bounce, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 01:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello how are you? I'm @JayRhyan. I resubmitted the page, could you review? JayRhyan (talk) 09:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, JayRhyan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 01:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Barcllay, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, how are you? I'm @JayRhyan. A thousand apologies for the lack of explanation. The content listed on the Barcllay page was written by Barcllay. The information cited on her page with links to references is exact from Croislla's page that was previously deleted. Both are friends, in Brazil, I see that they spread news on several sites for a fee. It has no relevant reference in Brazilian national media. Her page is promotional content, she doesn't have as much popularity as the page claims to have. In addition, the articles in Portuguese about her talk about a context of transphobia in which she went through, but without withholding information about her authenticity as an artist. Also, it has links to store pages as a reference. JayRhyan (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2022 (UTC)