Jamesdanielclark, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi Jamesdanielclark! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Hello, Jamesdanielclark, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Snowysusan (talk) 20:49, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

A personal welcome

edit

Hi Jamesdanielclark,

  • Some folk have already given you a rubber-stamp welcome but I'd like to make it more personal. Welcome aboard! If you need any help, just ask. Personally, I do some work on transport articles and have cited biglorryblog &c and I think there's room for improvement in these areas.
  • Sources are your best friend. If you want to get the Commercial Motor article off the ground, it's going to need independent sources (ie. other people/organisations talking about CM) in order to pass wikipedia's notability rule. If you want to add content to an article, sources are the best possible foundation. And if you get into a dispute with somebody, asking "What do the sources say?" is the best way to solve the problem. bobrayner (talk) 11:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Looks like commercialmotor.com is down. Is it likely to return? Has it moved? Or is it game over? bobrayner (talk) 14:09, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Commercialmotor.com is back up and running, it was a domain renewal issue that has now been resolved. No plans as far as I know to move the site! Jamesdanielclark (talk) 08:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Commercial Motor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 04:44, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

The article you created Commercial Motor

edit

Thank you for your submission. I appreciate the declaration in your User page as an employee. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia: Promotion, which should be of help. Connected-contributor contributions to Wikipedia articles are discouraged. I have added banner-flags and cleaned-up several aspects of the article and left guidance within the edit summaries.

There is a standard message for this but as you've been welcomed and messaged previously I've made it a personal message. Thank you.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 14:03, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Rocknrollmancer: Thanks for this. I am aware of the Conflict of Interest advice, which is why I declared my position as an employee of the parent company. Commercial Motor also went through the Articles for creation process as recommended. Creating the article was purely a personal decision, although I appreciate you will have to take my word for that and it still constitutes COI. On a side note, I am interested in your removal of the list of past editors for this title. This was based on other Wikipedia articles relating to print publications, for example The Spectator#Editors, New Statesman#List_of_editors, The_Herald_(Glasgow)#Editorship and so on. I genuinely believed it was standard practice, and would be interested to hear why you believe Commercial Motor is notable enough to warrant an article but not notable enough for that article to include a brief list of former editors? (Sorry, reading that back it sounds a bit confrontational - it was a genuine question meant in good faith)

Orphaned non-free image File:Commercial-motor-cover.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Commercial-motor-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply