Your submission at Articles for creation: Russell Reynolds Associates (May 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 22:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russell Reynolds Associates (July 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. LaMona (talk) 20:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! JCTH2015, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 20:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russell Reynolds Associates (July 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. LaMona (talk) 20:25, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russell Reynolds Associates (August 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Roe was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Joe Roe (talk) 01:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
In considerations to this Draft, there still hasn't been anything to satisfy our policies and thus has nothing significant for acceptance, see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Russell Reynolds Associates. SwisterTwister talk 21:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, JCTH2015. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
Message added 01:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Whpq (talk) 01:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Russell Reynolds Associates has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Russell Reynolds Associates. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 03:17, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russell Reynolds Associates (April 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Russell Reynolds Associates

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Russell Reynolds Associates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply