Adding content to Dublin,Ireland's postal district any objections edit

Any objects to adding Dublin,Ireland's postal districts IrishRepublic5 (talk) 21:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, IrishRepublic5, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ww2censor (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
style="color:#00
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Dublin Postal Districts edit

I removed your links in DPD because they just link back to the list article you placed them in, so they have no value. Wikilinks are supposed to link you somewhere else of interest. ww2censor (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

a false accusation edit

  Hello. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts will be blocked from editing. Guliolopez (talk) 19:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi,I have been recently adding content which I have found on all island research observations.Which is based on the Irish census of 2016 which is a national census carried out the the Irish Government every 5 years. BTW who is jackw436? If you search the content you many find the location of the electored division in which it states the catholic population and also the non catholic population and this is why I added to my Sources and I am in the process of making progress and searching up other sources in-case there could be biased information on this Sources .— Preceding unsigned comment added by IrishRepublic5 (talkcontribs)

All I hear is quack quack quack. Guliolopez (talk) 19:48, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • That is not the correct saying i all hear is it makes no sense it is (all i have heard is )is which is the right saying.
  • Comment vous le saves means as you know.

I always assume good faith ,I don't see any problem occuring.— Preceding unsigned comment added by IrishRepublic5 (talkcontribs) :::Here's another saying for you. You may hear it in (school)? tomorrow?. "It's your own time you're wasting". Guliolopez (talk) 20:01, 26 September 2017 (UTC) I see you may think you are funny but no one here is laughing at you ,I see you are highly ignorant man with lack of sense of humor.which you may need to get out more ,The way you talk says it all. New user to Wikipedia should not be treat with such lack of respect.Reply

  • You have made me fell very down ,which such lack of respect ,I fell very vulnerable and I have lost my self-confidence.

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:34, 26 September 2017 (UTC) Thanks evergreenfir for helping in this bad time for me.Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IrishRepublic5 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here I am only here to help wikipedia ,not to abuse other editor,give me a chance and I promise there will be no distribution to other editor ,I am here to Help develop Articles of Places in the UK and Ireland

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:00, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.