Welcome Inosavos!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 47,639,266 registered editors!
Hello, Inosavos. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:
  The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia
  A Primer for Newcomers
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  Wikipedia Training Modules
  Simplified Manual of Style
  Creating a new article via the Article Wizard
When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
  1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly
  2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources
  3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

  Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia
  Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia
  Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the   button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.


July 2020

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Boravelli has been reverted.
Your edit here to Boravelli was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://mapcarta.com/33278870) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2020

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 13:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Inosavos (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I've made a mistake with an image I uploaded in an article I created, where I declared as it being mine during the upload process. I got the image from the person's twitter page and edited the background with photoshop. I realise now the seriousness of my action and will revert from uploading any image in the future as I'm not sure I know how to find the needed copyright details. I would like to get unblocked as I enjoyed writing in Wikipedia and would love to be able to contribute with new articles or additions in the fields of Work 4.0, futurists and work automation. Regarding the article in question and the implication of being paid for writing this, I wrote it because Jesuthasan is a person I admire and got to know him through his latest book and the chance I had to watch a speech of his last January. I don't kmow him in person and definitely do not have any professional relation with him. For creating my article I "copied" the layout I saw in an article for another person I admire Marshall Goldsmith. Glad to provide any details requested. Wish for your favourable decision. Thank you! Inosavos (talk) 3:17 pm, 12 August 2020, Wednesday (1 month, 1 day ago) (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. This has been open over a month and has not convinced an admin to unblock. Please consider resubmitting with different expression of your understanding of what you did in violation of policy and what things you will do going forward. What kind of edits would you make if unblocked? only (talk) 02:20, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Inosavos (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to ask for an admin to have my blocking reviewed. As stated in my previous request, it is clear to me that I've been blocked for falsely declaring ownership of an image I uploaded to an article. I found and took the person's image from his twitter page and both naively and for my convenience, did not give any thought to copyrights. I really hope that I will be given a second chance as I enjoyed my short time of editing. Thanks in advance and I will not bother you again if my unblock request is denied again. Inosavos (talk) 00:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

it is clear to me that I've been blocked for falsely declaring ownership of an image I uploaded to an article That's not why you were blocked. You were blocked for promotional editing and undisclosed COI editing. It's these issues that your unblock request needs to address. The copyright issue only came up, because as MER-C put it, it shows that "you have been economical with the truth". Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Inosavos (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Apologies if it's not the correct way to reply to Jackmcbarn's comment. Thought it was the image. I cannot accept that I was paid for this as I don't even know Jesuthasan personally let alone being paid by him. As I've written before, I attended a conference where he gave a keynote and that's the closest I've ever been to him. I'm generally interested in Future of work and AI impact on society and workforce. That is why I added Jesuthasan's profile and I was also preparing a few additions for Gerd Leonhard's existing profile as well as planning to add Inma Martinez page (all people I follow and admire). Out of curiocity, I've read several relative articles but still it's not clear to me how you distinguish a paid from a non-paid article especially regarding a living person. To me, any page about a living person or operational company in Wikipedia could be assumed to be paid, especially when it was initially published. Thanks for your time. Inosavos (talk) 11:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I was willing to conditionally unblock, and have received no response for two weeks. signed, Rosguill talk 19:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would be willing to consider accepting the above request if you promise to not edit articles about living people or companies that are still in business. Would you be willing to accept these terms? signed, Rosguill talk 22:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Rosguill and thank you for your reply. The easy way for me would be to promise what you propose in order to possibly get unblocked. But since my main subject of interest revolves around living people and active organisms (WEF, consulting firms' studies), I don't see on what I could write about in that case. What I can promise is that any edit or article I create will be heavily referenced and structured to my best ability in order to contribute to Wikipedia. Of course, I will never repeat any stupid mistake, as I did with the image I uploaded, of taking lightly the copyrights or Wikipedia's instructions. What I could also promise is that I am willing to submit any new article for approval prior to publishing it, if there is such possibility. Hope that you see this favourably and thank you for your time regardless of the outcome. Inosavos (talk) 07:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, given your contribution history, which closely matches the patterns we usually see from paid editors, the only way I'm going to be comfortable unblocking you is if you stay away from the aforementioned topics indefinitely. If you can make significant positive contributions to other parts of the encyclopedia, you can appeal to have the restriction lifted at a later date. signed, Rosguill talk 14:47, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Rosguill. I just wanted to thank you for your positie approach and fully respect your position. Unfortunately, Wikipedia editing is of no interest to me if i cannot write on subjects of interest. Nevertheless, it's still unclear to me how you can distinuish a paid from non-paid edit when refering to a living person. Anyway, no point taking up more of your time. Thanks againand all the best. Inosavos (talk) 15:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Ravin Jesuthasan

edit
 

Hello, Inosavos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ravin Jesuthasan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi UnitedStatesian, thank you for your message. Unfortunately I've been blocked indefinitely, as it seems, for being accused of paid post. Therefore, I cannot make any edits. I would be very happy to discuss if you see any way of being unblocked and being able to post again. Otherwise, please go ahead and delete the draft post. Thank you for your time. Inosavos (talk) 23:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply