Welcome!

edit

Hi Indianboy11! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Magenta, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:06, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I remove this data because this not is not more in circulation in India means this not is banned Indianboy11 (talk) 09:12, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:Bbb23, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

i added this links because this links are related. Indianboy11 (talk) 11:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 

Hello Indianboy11. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Indianboy11. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Indianboy11|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Tell me about all rules in your message in easy language I will follow your rules now. Indianboy11 (talk) 11:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
It is your job to learn and to know all the rules. If in any doubt pleases at WP:TEAHOUSE. If you have an imperfect understanding of English please find a native speaker of English in your area to help you. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Timtrent Sorry, but it appears that your autocorrect malfunctioned. — kashmīrī TALK 11:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
And I didn't charge from any brands check i have edited others brands and public and government pages places and many more. Indianboy11 (talk) 11:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Be specific, please. Answer the question as written. Do not edit further until you have given a clear answer. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Indianboy11, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Indianboy11|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. You have not given a clear answer, but continue to edit. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Honey 3.0

edit

I reverted your edits to Honey 3.0 because the subject fails WP:NALBUMS. The redirect stays. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:32, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

But the album is exist. Indianboy11 (talk) 08:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I know; It doesn't matter. Not all albums are notable. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:12, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Twitter

edit

There’s a giant warning text in red that tells you why we are not renaming the page, and that is in addition to the countless amount of discussions on the very same page. Please read before posting. NM 07:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

Please stop adding links to Microsoft products in See Also sections. Your actions appear purely promotional, and those repeated links do not comply with MOS:SEEALSO. — kashmīrī TALK 10:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

thanks for your suggestion. Indianboy11 (talk) 10:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I advised you to read MOS:SEEALSO. Please stop violating it. — kashmīrī TALK 11:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Yamla (talk) 11:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Why you have blocked me. Indianboy11 (talk) 11:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Your edits were clearly and obviously deliberately disruptive. --Yamla (talk) 11:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
i am stopping editing brands pages. Indianboy11 (talk) 11:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I am now working on government pages and adding logos and caotions Indianboy11 (talk) 11:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
No. You are now blocked. And "caotions" isn't a word. --Yamla (talk) 11:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
dont revert all pages because every page is not bad. Indianboy11 (talk) 11:58, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Yamla I must agree here with Indianboy11 - their edits to short descriptions were all a needed improvement, compliant with WP:SHORTDESC. Will you mind restoring their shorter versions? — kashmīrī TALK 12:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
No. This account was set up to evade a block on another account. All edits were therefore in violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Note also they set up at least one new account after this one was blocked to continue evading their block. I also disagree that the edits were an improvement, but I do concede this is debatable. --Yamla (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
kashmīrī, if you wish to reinstate the edits, taking full responsibility for them, you are free to do so and I would not oppose your edits. --Yamla (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Kashmiri (talk page watcher) Be selective. By no means all of their edits were as usueful as you may believe. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Timtrent I looked at the most recent ones - short descriptions to articles on Indian state governments, to be precise. @Yamla, thanks, I'll do a revert if you don't mind, it will save quite a few clicks (yes I know that policy requires undoing each edit manually, but hey, life is short). Cheers, — kashmīrī TALK 14:58, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I do not object to you reverting my reverts, provided you manually review each one and decide it is appropriate to do so. I freely accept that I won't be able to tell, given the tiny size of the edits, it'll mostly look like you are automatically reverting me. :) --Yamla (talk) 14:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, done. Please ignore multiple revert notifications. Cheers, — kashmīrī TALK 15:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Bharat Rupee" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Bharat Rupee has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 29 § Bharat Rupee until a consensus is reached. Northern Moonlight 07:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Bharat Rs" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Bharat Rs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 29 § Bharat Rs until a consensus is reached. Northern Moonlight 07:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply