User talk:IanManka/Archive/5

Latest comment: 18 years ago by Robdurbar in topic 1942 World Cup
Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

This archive page covers approximately the dates between 6 March 2006 and 20 April 2006.

Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary.


FIFA World Cup not FA - again edit

(oh, you archived it) I also thank you, and I am totally willing to do what I can to help with this article. Conscious 20:37, 6 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I wasn't vandalising edit

There is a link to Barker on the picture thumb caption, why do you need two? The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.207.210.139 (talk • contribs) .

Times edit

I tried looking at hangman again, and I finally understood it!!! One thing I don't understand about it-on my calender, it's the seventh, but people were dating their guesses for March eighth. And, what about actual time of day? Does Wikipedia run on a 24 or 12 hour clock? Of course, you only have to put in your signiture and it happens automatically, but I still want to understand it.Tigereye 53 01:04, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

New Sports Wiki/Community edit

I noticed you were a Nationals and Indians Fan. My friends and I started a sports wiki/community that you may be interested in. It uses Wikipedia's software but we made a lot of technological improvements to allow for more news, opinion articles, and better integration of sports statistics. The site is located here: <link removed, determined to be linkspam>. Check our baseball, Nationals, and Indians section its pretty cool:

<links removed, as they were determined to be linkspam.>

When you get the chance, let me know what you think.

Thanks!

--Awrigh01 20:08, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

--Thanks for checking out the site! We're still working on the layout and the design. So check back in the future you may be surprised --Awrigh01 16:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

AMA edit

Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome.Gator (talk) 14:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sports wiki links edit

Sure, if you're interested in having the link handy for your own use you can keep it. On talk pages where someone has replied to the post I've usually excised the link and left behind a link to the page history. Mostly, I want to remove as much of the linkspam as possible without annoying beneficial editors who are interested in making use of the link.

I don't know whether he's trying to manipulate his Alexa rank or Google PageRank or just directly drive traffic to his site; whatever his motives, he shouldn't be using Wikipedia's bandwidth and servers for it. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 04:17, 14 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sports Wiki Apology edit

I was formerly Awrigh01 until blocked. Wasn't trying to manipulate our Alexa ranks or Google PageRank. We just wanted to spread the word about some cool extensions we added to Mediawiki. If I (or one of my friends) offended, I deeply apologize. We thought that fellow Wikipedians would be interested. We are just trying to extend Wikipedia's amazing technology. --Awright38 05:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks for the message. Will keep you posted --Awright38 06:31, 14 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Thanks for the correction on the Hangman stump count. I should make things a bit easier now. -- WB 06:01, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

world cup draw edit

I myself did that same Google search, and it appears that almost every reference to the ad comes from Wikipedia itself. Is there no place that actually has a version of this ad? Because it is extremely annoying for readers to read something like that and not be able to see it themselves... and if there is no working link / reliable reference then I am not sure such information should be included...

DJR (Talk) 16:16, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

"Get the Picture" & Nick GAS apology edit

i'm sorry & apologized, i promise i never do wrong to this page again. will you ever forgive me?

—This unsigned comment was added by 198.246.32.99 (talkcontribs) .

Big time slot records on Nick GAS & why other shows are still not been aired? edit

between January 2004 and present; Nick Arcade at 4 & 430a/3 & 330c, Finders Keepers at 5a & 530/4 & 430c & Get the Picture at 1p & 130/12 & 1230c has held the most days in a same each time slot. the 2nd most was double dare 2000 at 230p/130c & 1a/12c, figure it out at 6p & 630 /5 & 530c, legends of the hidden temple at 7 & 730p/ 6 & 630c and guts at 9p, 930, 12a, 1230a/ 8p, 830, 11p & 1130c. splash tv, wild & crazy kids & double dare has not been aired since late 2004 & super sloppy double dare, family double dare, global guts & sk8tv have not been aired since fall 2005, when they come back on Nick GAS?

CCOTW backlog removal edit

I did select a new Article, all the other nominations were expired. It was changed from Billy Wilder to Bee Season. Billy Wilder had been up there for months. Thefourdotelipsis 01:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Dude,you have nothing to worry about. you have not violated anything.

—This unsigned comment was added by 63.235.9.66 (talkcontribs) .

ha

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Grimsy (talkcontribs) .

User_talk:Thefourdotelipsis edit

Hi. I can't remember what I wrote on this user's page, but either way he and I know each other personally and insult each other in a 'playful' manner on a regular basis. Both parties realise that whatever is said is said sarcastically and/or un-seriously. What did I write? Second, this was on HIS user talk page, not yours. If you have a problem with what is written on a user's talk page, then chances are the user will too, and at that time, THEY have the right to remove it. Please do not edit someone else's talk page without having authorisation first. Furthermore, if you DO edit another user's page to remove 'uncivil' comments, then at least only get rid of the uncivil part, not the entire message! Thank you. David P. A. Hunter 02:24, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply


FIFA World Cup yet again edit

I'm ready for it. And I must admit you're better at presenting articles than I am :) Conscious 11:35, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure I'm ready, but that a moot point now ;). There's nothing like the pressure of a featured nomination to make you do work on an article. We've a way to go yet, but I think we can get there. Oldelpaso 19:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the barnstar, its certainly cheered me up after having an article listed on AfD. The FAC is looking promising at the moment, but I'm still looking to make improvements. I suppose the biggest question is what content to put in the main article and what to put in the history one (assuming it survives ;-) ). Oldelpaso 23:27, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Anticipating, anticipating... :) Conscious 07:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

1942 World Cup edit

I noticed that you de-linked this one; I was wondering whether you thought that there would be legs in creating a bit of an article about this world cup that never was? How far did they go into the planning and organization of it? There is a 1944 Summer Olypmics article, after all. Robdurbar 23:13, 14 April 2006 (UTC)Reply


Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18