User talk:IanManka/Archive/2

Latest comment: 18 years ago by Chanheigeorge in topic Oops
Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

This archive page covers approximately the dates between 21 December 2005 and 01:31 UTC 12 January 2006.

Note about archiving: in archive two, I have a message that belongs in archive three. However, the message was more relevant in archive two, and that's where it ended up.

Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary.


Schism edit

There is a category (which I belong to) called "Roman Catholic Wikipedians". I was wondering if you'd switch to that one, because in my eyes that is the main Catholic Category. It has dozens of users which just don't appear under the Catholic Wikipedians Category. Chooserr 21:55, 24 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Regarding Association of Members' Advocates edit

Hi, you are recieving this message because you have listed yourself as an active member of WP:AMA. If you aren't currently accepting inquiries for AMA, please de-list yourself from Wikipedia:AMA Advocates accepting inquiries, and consider noting it on the main list of members on WP:AMA. If you are, please consider tending to any new requests that may appear on Wikipedia:AMA_Requests_for_Assistance. We're going to put AMA on wheels. :) (please direct any responses to my talk page) --Phroziac . o º O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!) 22:16, 24 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Well, AMA has been kinda inactive for a while, and someone on IRC suggested i help revive it. All of those cases appear to have been taken care of though. --Phroziac . o º O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!) 01:48, 25 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Userbox Images edit

I understand that there is concern about copyrighted images, but I have no reason to believe that usage of images in userbox templates for Identification purposes is a violation. It seems to be part of fair use under the heading of logos. I will be reverting templates to the original images until I see some evidence that there is a copyvio issue. --Dschor 23:23, 28 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Ah sorry edit

Feel free to change it back if you want

I mistook your meaning. It looked like you were saying it a sarcastic kinda way, as in "this user just drinks and nothing else". ;) --Mistress Selina Kyle (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉) 04:06, 29 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Football AID edit

 
Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

Football World Cup has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

NFL Draft edit

The 49ers and Raiders already did the coin flipped. I was pretty insulted that you deleted my source which is from a pretty notable organization, ESPN. ;-P --J. Nguyen 06:09, 4 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nevermind --J. Nguyen 06:11, 4 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

AMA edit

Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome. Izehar 22:21, 6 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Cornell hockey userbox edit

Yea, that was a good move, I just didn't know how to do it. Nice work Cornell Rockey 22:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Question on Arbcom/medcom edit

Hi, I'm curious why you think it's not permissible to be on both arbcom and medcom -- are you worried about concentration of power, conflict of interest, not enough time to do both, or the possible need to recuse? I honestly don't think any of these should be reasons, but I'm curious as to your reasoning. --Improv 06:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • Ian, I have revised my candidacy statement. If you're interested in revisiting it, it may be to your interest. --Improv 00:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Deleted page subpage request removed, as it has since been deleted. You may consult the page history if you wish to see the message.

Re: Barnstar Award edit

Conscious edit

Thank you Ian. Conscious 08:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sebastian Kessel edit

Hey, Same here, but you're not undeserved, so allow me to reciprocate! Sebastian Kessel Talk 16:12, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

<attached barnstar moved to userpage> — Ian Manka Questions? Talk to me! || edited section to sort of break up things... 23:49, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Chanheigeorge edit

Thanks for your award. I won't be editing as much in the near future, but if you need anything from me, just drop me a note. Chanheigeorge 01:27, 12 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Oops edit

Sorry for editing your archive.... I'm still a newbie here. Chanheigeorge 01:31, 12 January 2006 (UTC)Reply


Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18