ILIKESPI

Welcome!

Hello, ILIKESPI, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dixie (game), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - MrX 19:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NATO: Operational Combat in Europe in the 1970s

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NATO: Operational Combat in Europe in the 1970s requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ...William 19:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Thanks for contributing the new article Armageddon: Tactical Combat, 3000-500 BC. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. - MrX 19:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Armageddon: Tactical Combat, 3000-500 BC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armageddon: Tactical Combat, 3000-500 BC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon: Tactical Combat, 3000-500 BC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - MrX 20:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Games articles

Hallo, thanks for contributing 3 new articles and editing a 4th. Unfortunately they have all been nominated for deletion on the basis that they have no references and don't show evidence of being "Notable". If you have any books or magazines, or websites, which discuss these games, please add references to the articles. It would also be useful if you told us more about the games: you just call them "games" without specifying whether they are videogames, boardgames, or what. I gather from looking at SPI's page that they are probably boardgames and war games, but please put this information into the articles: it's not obvious. Thanks. PamD 10:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC)