IAmSeamonkey2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quwivirus (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Laplorfill was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quwivirus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Quwivirus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Laplorfill (talk) 03:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, IAmSeamonkey2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Laplorfill (talk) 03:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Quwivirus has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Quwivirus. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Quwivirus has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Quwivirus. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quwivirus has been accepted

Quwivirus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 06:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

November 2022

Hello, I'm Kerry Raymond. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shire of Boulia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It's great to update the census figures but you must update the citation to the 2021 census data. Kerry (talk) 01:21, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Kerry. I apologise for the mistake, I simply forgot to add the citation when I made the edit. It has been fixed now. thank you for pulling me up on this IAmSeamonkey2 (talk) 10:18, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Infobox legislature

I noticed your addition of the infobox legislature to Lockyer Valley Region. While there is nothing wrong with adding infoboxes, there is still the normal expectation for the information to be reliably sourced and particularly so when living people are involved. The sourcing can be in the article or the infobox. I can see the list of mayor, deputy and other councillors can be found here so that's easy enough to add, but the information about political groupings is not there. Nor is it at the electoral commission's website. Where is that coming from? As a second issue, I am not sure that Independent (LNP) is a valid political grouping. This is a common confusion we have with councils where someone who is a member of a political party was elected to a council, but, if they did not stand for election as a candidate for that party, then they are independents as far as the council composition is concerned. So either that one person contested as an LNP candidate or they contested as an independent. It's generally only the larger cities where candidates contest as party members, for the smaller communities, they normally contest as independents. Kerry (talk) 05:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)