HowardStrong
October 2012 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
The article Coinbase has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No assertion of notability, as it is far too new a company. The only information about it is coming directly from its founder.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MSJapan (talk) 19:29, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Note edit
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 20:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry edit
 | This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HowardStrong. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Berean Hunter (talk) 03:55, 4 November 2012 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coinbase is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coinbase until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 19:57, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry edit
| | This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HowardStrong. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Berean Hunter (talk) 02:41, 11 November 2012 (UTC) |
Bitcoind/Bitcoin-Qt listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bitcoind/Bitcoin-Qt. Since you had some involvement with the Bitcoind/Bitcoin-Qt redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MSJapan (talk) 01:06, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Bitcoin Core edit
Hi, since I saw you worked on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin-Qt, maybe you'd like to have a say in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin XT. --Ysangkok (talk) 17:12, 29 June 2020 (UTC)