November 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi - the highlighting of one group that contributes to SPI-MO is self-promotion. There were several academic groups that contributed; it's clearly inappropriate to highlight one. A full list of participants can be found at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/scientific-advisory-group-for-emergencies-sage-coronavirus-covid-19-response-membership/list-of-participants-of-sage-and-related-sub-groups
Would you agree that it's inappropriate self-promotion to highlight one institution (Imperial) one participant and one centre only in the main text, and how would you propose to rectify that constructively? Houseythehouse (talk) 12:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply