HooperX
Please refrain from using profanity in your comments. Poofyspikes 23:10, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
Under permissions you stated this image has a CC 2.0 license. However, the tag you used for the article indicates it's a CC 2.5 license. Which license is correct? Rklawton 03:03, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:MichaelGelmanJoyCantilo.jpg edit
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MichaelGelmanJoyCantilo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:02, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:MarkBurnettJoyCantilo.jpg edit
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MarkBurnettJoyCantilo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jusjih (talk • contribs) 02:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Nomination of Chase figure for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chase figure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chase figure until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 20:04, 7 October 2011 (UTC)