Hocimi, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Hocimi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Lorentz category edit

I don't think the Lorentz category is a good idea. You should probably familiarize yourself with the criteria for creating a category. It is perfectly adequate to have that same list in the article Hendrik Lorentz, so I urge you to remove it. Someone will sooner or later anyway. YohanN7 (talk) 16:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SpinningSpark 19:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Abel Tasman ?? edit

That is a lot of the Tasmanian project items you are changing there, are you really sure you know what you are doing? JarrahTree 06:25, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

I am about to revert some of your edits, because I disagree that your removal of existing categories that are valid is out of order.

Abel Tasman was a historic figure, and in the strictest sense, nothing to do at all with current Tasmania, you may have misunderstood what wikipedia is about - please before responding, think very carefully about an answer, it could have import upon how or whether some of your edits will probably be reverted... It also might be that you removed some valid categories without realising you had done so, I would allow for that as an honest mistake JarrahTree 06:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Perspective - you have an enthusiasm for shared names - per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_December_8#Category:Daniel_Gabriel_Fahrenheit - here in wp en we prefer direct association that is specific and obviously related JarrahTree 06:51, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

December 2016 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 15:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Economy of the Dutch Republic has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Economy of the Dutch Republic, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:40, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Culture of the Dutch Golden Age has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Culture of the Dutch Golden Age, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Works about Christiaan Huygens has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Works about Christiaan Huygens, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Prints by Rembrandt has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Prints by Rembrandt, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Cornelius Jansen has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Cornelius Jansen, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Scholars of Dutch history has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Scholars of Dutch history, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Historians of the Low Countries has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Historians of the Low Countries, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:22, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Batches of categories nominated for discussion edit

See:

Marcocapelle (talk) 07:06, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Historians of Dutch Jewry has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Historians of Dutch Jewry, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:29, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Works by Christiaan Huygens has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Works by Christiaan Huygens, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Works about Hergé has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Works about Hergé, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:15, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:18th-century Dutch inventors has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:18th-century Dutch inventors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:13, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Naval history of the Dutch Republic has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Naval history of the Dutch Republic, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:37, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Abraham Kuyper has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Abraham Kuyper, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 22:41, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Hocimi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Hocimi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:17th-century Dutch political philosophers has been nominated for splitting edit

 

Category:17th-century Dutch political philosophers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 06:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:17th-century Dutch anatomists has been nominated for splitting edit

 

Category:17th-century Dutch anatomists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Spinozist philosophers edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Spinozist philosophers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Neo-Spinozism edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Neo-Spinozism indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Spinozist philosophers has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Spinozist philosophers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Psychastes (talk) 03:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply