Speedy deletion nomination of User:High5Texas/sandbox edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:High5Texas/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Melcous (talk) 05:39, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

High5Texas, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi High5Texas! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kamran Nezami has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kamran Nezami. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamran Nezami (January 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 20:20, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamran Nezami (January 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 23:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Kamran Nezami concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kamran Nezami, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm LynxTufts. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Saona Island have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. LynxTufts (talk) 18:02, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spam and suspected compromised account.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:06, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Reply