Your submission at Articles for creation: Gwangju Castle (January 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 11:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Hansung023, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 11:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Hansung023. You have new messages at WP:TEA.
Message added 14:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

——SerialNumber54129 14:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Hansung023! You created a thread called How long do I have to wait for a new article? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 20 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


Ways to improve Gwangju Castle edit

Thanks for creating Gwangju Castle.

A New Page Patroller Rosguill just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

As other editors have pointed out, there are claims in this article that do not have citations attached, and it could use some more citations overall. Additionally, it needs some copyediting.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 00:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply