Hadgimarvi

Welcome!

Hello, Bir1akce, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Tito☸Dutta 03:26, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Frozen Cypriots

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Frozen Cypriots requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KJ ^Discuss? 05:33, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop creating duplicate articles for Kalo Chorio (Çamlıköy)

Hello. Another editor has alerted me to the fact that you keep creating duplicate articles to the existing article Kalo Chorio (Çamlıköy). I have redirected all of your recently created, duplicate entries to the older article. If you have any information you want to add please add it to the existing article Kalo Chorio (Çamlıköy). Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 20:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Your recent editing history at İstasyon (Çamlıköy) Cyprus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 05:59, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

• I am new at Wikipedia therefore it is possible that I do make some errors but that should not be interpreted as "I am in an "edit war". Please note that the page İstasyon (Çamlıköy) Cyprus was directed by you to Kalo Chorio (Çamlıköy). I would like to draw your attention to the fact that İstasyon is only an abondened neighborhood within Çamlıköy. So it should not have been considered as Çamlıköy. --Bir1akce (talk) 06:16, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

• This is just an information message regarding the limits of the number of reversions of other editors' edits and the appearance of such reversions as an edit-war. It does not mean that you are engaging in one. If this is an abandoned neighbourhood it is not notable on its own so it belongs to the village of Çamlıköy. It is not supposed to have an article of its own, hence the redirect. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 06:31, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

• With this mentality of yours, Varosha, Famagusta is not supposed to have an article of its own on Wikipedia either.--Bir1akce (talk) 07:32, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

• Again, please do not make this personal. Please see WP:AVOIDYOU. Also please understand this is a collaborative project known as a wiki. This is not a vacuum. There are thousands of editors here, all of whom can see what everyone else is doing on this wiki. Nothing is hidden here. I am not trying to impose anything on you. Nobody can, otherwise they would be blocked sooner or later. I am just trying to represent the rules of this wiki as best I can. If you do not believe what I am telling you about this neighbourhood, go to any editor or administrator and ask them if an abandoned neighbourhood of a small village is notable enough to have its own article. Let's see what they will tell you. As far as the example of Varosha, don't you think Varosha is slightly bigger that this tiny village, let alone its even tinier neighbourhood? So no more exaggerations please. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 07:46, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hadgimarvi, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 18:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

The insults and harassments of certain POWed editors

There is no use of defending myself or appeal to be unblocked because the insults and harassments of Hellenic-POWed users such as Δρ.Κ. to those who insistently support neutral/objective stance, continue without being punished.--Hadgimarvi (talk) 11:36, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

'Fake merger' involving the same editors mentioned above: Where is the official merge-proposal?

@Bob the Wikipedian: This the fake mergerThis the fake merger this is the article before the redirect and this is the discussion that led to the merger is tolerated to ruin the reputation of Wikipedia.--Hadgimarvi (talk) 11:36, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Merge proposal

The town where the port is located has been known as Gemikonagi long before the 1974 Cyprus War; why merging it's article to Karavostasi in 2014?.

The name of the town has always been Gemikonagi (Gemi Konaghi) --Hadgimarvi (talk) 15:16, 4 November 2014 (UTC) The harbour is too small to warrant its own article. Beside that, the article is not exactly neutral. A short piece in the article LefkaKaravostasiGemikonagi seems sufficient. The Banner talk 10:32, 22 October 2014 (UTC) Corrected: The Banner talk 18:31, 22 October 2014 (UTC) Corrected again. The Banner talk 11:56, 4 November 2014 (UTC) The harbour is nearest to Karavostasi. Lefka is farther inland. Unsurprisingly, it seems to be referred to as either the Port of Karavostasi or the Port of Gemikonagi. 93.109.171.237 (talk) 12:36, 22 October 2014 (UTC) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL @The Banner: I'm wondering if you could move the article to Port of Gemikonagi or somesuch in the meantime? 93.109.171.237 (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2014 (UTC) That would be confusing for others and complicating procedures. Give it ten days. When no one objects, we can merge. The Banner talk 21:51, 22 October 2014 (UTC) Beside that, Gemikonagi and Karavostasi are identical. So I have changed the merge proposal back to Gemikonagi, as that is the present name of the human settlement. The Banner talk 13:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC) You didn't change it 'back'; you changed it, full stop. 213.7.147.34 (talk) 14:54, 3 November 2014 (UTC) Don't merge @The Banner: This title is subject to a dispute While discussing it here in order to reach Wikipedia:Consensus Some preferred to do things their own way and moved Gemikonagi to Karavostasi--200.26.172.178 (talk) 11:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC) I don't have an opinion on whether to merge it. There's probably quite a bit more to say about Karavostasi's port than the village itself. 93.109.171.237 (talk) 18:56, 22 October 2014 (UTC) This port is located in Gemikonagi(Karavostasi) which is a neighborhood in Lefka, and is officially named as Lefka Port not only during the English period but long before that too. I therefore think that the article should not be merged with any other. --Hadgimarvi (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2014 (UTC) Right, but it seems now it's more often referred to as Gemikonagi or Karavostasi. Thanks for the extract. 31.153.72.171 (talk) 16:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC) *Don't merge -Until 1974, Greeks referred this port by the names of Karavostasi, Lefka or Xeros port. For the last 40 years I don't think even the existence of this port is known or cared by many of the new Greek Cypriot generations but the Greek Cypriot authorities refer it, as Karavostasi Port. Since the administrations of the ports in North Cyprus came under the jurisdiction of Turkish Cypriots, officially and internationally the port is widely known and referred as the Port of Gemikonagi but many Turkish Cypriots still refer to it as the Port of Lefke as well as Gemikonagi Port. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hadgimarvi (talk • contribs) 06:33, 29 October 2014 (UTC) References Aha, I forgot to change the subject of the merge proposal into Gemikonagi instead of Karavostasi. That is now fixed. The Banner talk 11:56, 4 November 2014 (UTC) Operational? Would anybody know/care to find out if this port is still operational? 93.109.171.237 (talk) 18:56, 22 October 2014 (UTC) Even though Gemikonagi Port is internationaly recognised, (International Port Code: CYMPB) its operations are limited since all of the ports in North Cyprus are closed to international traffic of goods, persons and services, because of the embargoes imposed on Turkish Cypriots --Hadgimarvi (talk) 09:11, 28 October 2014 References

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hadgimarvi, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 02:46, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

I see that, while you were blocked for sockpuppetry, you have continued with more sockpuppetry. Your block has therefore been extended to indefinite. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC)